Administration of non-national immunization program vaccines for children under six in a rural county, Henan Province: Did costs matter?

This study aimed to investigate caregivers’ administration of non-National Immunization Program (NIP) vaccines in rural China, and examine health system, individual, and social determinants. A cross-sectional survey (<i>n</i> = 1051) was conducted from July to October in 2022 in a rural county of Henan Province. Caregivers of children under six who came to township health centers for child vaccination were interviewed. Cross-tabulation and multivariate logistic regressions were used to examine the administration rate and associated factors. Qualitative interviews were conducted with healthcare professionals (<i>n</i> = 4) and caregivers (Focus Group Discussions, <i>n</i> = 4) to understand local policies, routine practices, and caregivers’ experience with the administration of non-NIP vaccines. A framework approach was used to analyze qualitative data. Quantitative and qualitative data were integrated during the interpretation of the results. The administration rate for non-NIP vaccines remained low in rural Henan, 26.7% of children had not received any non-NIP vaccines, 43.5% had received 1–2 types, and around 30% had received 3–5 types. There were no significant differences in the administration of non-NIP vaccines between left-behind and non-left-behind children after adjusting for characteristics of children, caregivers, and households. Qualitative findings reflected that the high cost of non-NIP vaccines was a primary factor influencing caregivers’ vaccination decision. Poor communication between physicians and caregivers was another significant factor, which was caused by low retention of healthcare workers, a shortage of professionals, and insufficient financial incentives for physicians. This study enriches the evidence on non-NIP vaccination among rural children, particularly for the vulnerable group of left-behind children.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28253727
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Administration of non-national immunization program vaccines for children under six in a rural county, Henan Province: Did costs matter?

Figshare
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

Administration of non-national immunization program vaccines for children under six in a rural county, Henan Province: Did costs matter?

article en

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate caregivers’ administration of non-National Immunization Program (NIP) vaccines in rural China, and examine health system, individual, and social determinants. A cross-sectional survey (<i>n</i> = 1051) was conducted from July to October in 2022 in a rural county of Henan Province. Caregivers of children under six who came to township health centers for child vaccination were interviewed. Cross-tabulation and multivariate logistic regressions were used to examine the administration rate and associated factors. Qualitative interviews were conducted with healthcare professionals (<i>n</i> = 4) and caregivers (Focus Group Discussions, <i>n</i> = 4) to understand local policies, routine practices, and caregivers’ experience with the administration of non-NIP vaccines. A framework approach was used to analyze qualitative data. Quantitative and qualitative data were integrated during the interpretation of the results. The administration rate for non-NIP vaccines remained low in rural Henan, 26.7% of children had not received any non-NIP vaccines, 43.5% had received 1–2 types, and around 30% had received 3–5 types. There were no significant differences in the administration of non-NIP vaccines between left-behind and non-left-behind children after adjusting for characteristics of children, caregivers, and households. Qualitative findings reflected that the high cost of non-NIP vaccines was a primary factor influencing caregivers’ vaccination decision. Poor communication between physicians and caregivers was another significant factor, which was caused by low retention of healthcare workers, a shortage of professionals, and insufficient financial incentives for physicians. This study enriches the evidence on non-NIP vaccination among rural children, particularly for the vulnerable group of left-behind children.

Figshare
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Administration of non-national immunization program vaccines for children under six in a rural county, Henan Province: Did costs matter? · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS