The effect of different midsole materials in safety shoes on perceived comfort, muscle activities, and biomechanical parameters during walking – a musculoskeletal modelling approach

In certain occupational environments, safety footwear is essential for mitigating the risk of foot, leg, or knee injuries. For employees, who have to stand or walk for extended periods in such footwear, ergonomic considerations and comfort play a key role in maintaining health and work capacity. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the subjective perception, muscle activities, and biomechanical parameters of the lower extremities during walking in safety shoes equipped with different midsole materials characterized by varying deformation and energy return properties. A prospective, randomized, single-blind crossover study was conducted with 24 healthy males wearing safety shoes in their daily work environments. Two S2 safety shoes with a comparable structural design but differing midsole materials (polyurethane (PU) vs. expanded thermoplastic polyurethane (eTPU)) were evaluated during walking with regard to subjective comfort, gait parameters, muscle activities as well as joint angles, joint moments, and muscle forces of the lower extremities calculated using a musculoskeletal multibody simulation. Both safety shoes received favourable comfort ratings from the participants. However, a significant majority expressed a preference for recommending the eTPU shoe model to their colleagues (eTPU: 14; PU: 5; p = 0.039). The musculoskeletal multibody simulation revealed only small midsole-related differences in upper ankle joint angle (1.24° ± 0.11°; p < 0.01) but no variations were observed in joint moments. However, the analysis identified lower muscle forces in the gastrocnemius medialis muscle, while wearing the safety shoes with an eTPU midsole (-1.05 ± 0.04 N/kg; p < 0.001). In conclusion, the midsole material had a low impact on subjective comfort as well as lower extremity joint angles and moments. However, the eTPU midsole may provide support to the plantar flexors during stance.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28571076.v1
Primary Topic
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effect of different midsole materials in safety shoes on perceived comfort, muscle activities, and biomechanical parameters during walking – a musculoskeletal modelling approach

Figshare
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
article

The effect of different midsole materials in safety shoes on perceived comfort, muscle activities, and biomechanical parameters during walking – a musculoskeletal modelling approach

article en

Abstract

In certain occupational environments, safety footwear is essential for mitigating the risk of foot, leg, or knee injuries. For employees, who have to stand or walk for extended periods in such footwear, ergonomic considerations and comfort play a key role in maintaining health and work capacity. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the subjective perception, muscle activities, and biomechanical parameters of the lower extremities during walking in safety shoes equipped with different midsole materials characterized by varying deformation and energy return properties. A prospective, randomized, single-blind crossover study was conducted with 24 healthy males wearing safety shoes in their daily work environments. Two S2 safety shoes with a comparable structural design but differing midsole materials (polyurethane (PU) vs. expanded thermoplastic polyurethane (eTPU)) were evaluated during walking with regard to subjective comfort, gait parameters, muscle activities as well as joint angles, joint moments, and muscle forces of the lower extremities calculated using a musculoskeletal multibody simulation. Both safety shoes received favourable comfort ratings from the participants. However, a significant majority expressed a preference for recommending the eTPU shoe model to their colleagues (eTPU: 14; PU: 5; p = 0.039). The musculoskeletal multibody simulation revealed only small midsole-related differences in upper ankle joint angle (1.24° ± 0.11°; p < 0.01) but no variations were observed in joint moments. However, the analysis identified lower muscle forces in the gastrocnemius medialis muscle, while wearing the safety shoes with an eTPU midsole (-1.05 ± 0.04 N/kg; p < 0.001). In conclusion, the midsole material had a low impact on subjective comfort as well as lower extremity joint angles and moments. However, the eTPU midsole may provide support to the plantar flexors during stance.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.