Additional file 1 of Source rupture process of the MW 6.2 earthquake in the Noto Peninsula, central Japan, on May 5, 2023

Additional file 1: Fig. S1. Bedrock depth and vertical cross section of JIVSM (Koketsu et al. 2012). (Top) Map of bedrock depth corresponding to the top depth at VS = 3.2 km/s in the FDM model space. The open star indicates the epicenter of the MW 6.2 earthquake on May 5, 2023, located by JMA. (Bottom) Vertical cross section of the S-wave velocity model of the JIVSM along lines A–A’. The open star indicates the hypocenter of the MW 6.2 earthquake on May 5, 2023, located by the JMA. Fig. S2. Comparison of simulated Green’s functions between forward (black) and reciprocal (red) simulations. Fig. S3. Comparison of synthetic velocity waveforms for three cases with different strike and dip angles (red, green, and blue) and observed velocity waveforms (black) in 0.05–1.0 Hz. Amplitudes were normalized to the maximum observed amplitude of each station. The maximum observed amplitude is shown above each trace in units of cm/s.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28853680.v1
Primary Topic
earthquake and tectonic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Additional file 1 of Source rupture process of the MW 6.2 earthquake in the Noto Peninsula, central Japan, on May 5, 2023

Figshare
earthquake and tectonic studies
article

Additional file 1 of Source rupture process of the MW 6.2 earthquake in the Noto Peninsula, central Japan, on May 5, 2023

article en

Abstract

Additional file 1: Fig. S1. Bedrock depth and vertical cross section of JIVSM (Koketsu et al. 2012). (Top) Map of bedrock depth corresponding to the top depth at VS = 3.2 km/s in the FDM model space. The open star indicates the epicenter of the MW 6.2 earthquake on May 5, 2023, located by JMA. (Bottom) Vertical cross section of the S-wave velocity model of the JIVSM along lines A–A’. The open star indicates the hypocenter of the MW 6.2 earthquake on May 5, 2023, located by the JMA. Fig. S2. Comparison of simulated Green’s functions between forward (black) and reciprocal (red) simulations. Fig. S3. Comparison of synthetic velocity waveforms for three cases with different strike and dip angles (red, green, and blue) and observed velocity waveforms (black) in 0.05–1.0 Hz. Amplitudes were normalized to the maximum observed amplitude of each station. The maximum observed amplitude is shown above each trace in units of cm/s.

Figshare
Kyoto University (JP)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
earthquake and tectonic studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.