Grammatical philosophy in classifying functional parts in the structures and compositions of the Arabic language

Summary:This research addresses the topic of (grammatical philosophy inclassifying the functional parts in the structures and structures of thephilosophy, classification, functionalism, tools, signtopic. It is based on what came from grammatical-philosophical studieson the functional characteristics of independent and non-independentlinguistic parts, which are called tools or signs in The structures andstructures of the Arabic language, and what is known as grammaticaland syntactic signs and their letters in the words and structures of theArabic language. What is known as the grammatical and syntactic signsand their letters in the words and structures of the Arabic language. Oneof the objectives of the research is to clarify the philosophical concept offunctional parts in the Arabic language, analyze the variousphilosophical classifications of functional parts between tools and signs,and highlight the philosophical aspects affecting this classification.Which helps to know the worker and non-worker, and to know whetherhe is the worker or the effect of the worker. Explaining the types of signsin the Arabic language, in terms of their division into grammatical signs(parsing and syntactic signs), morphological signs (numerical, gender,and temporal), and verbal derivational signs (subjective, object,exaggeration, superlative, and simile). I followed the descriptive andanalytical approach in dealing with the individuals of the phenomenonunder study, and the comparative approach in comparing the doctrinesof the Basra and Kufan grammarians regarding its essence. The studywas divided into two sections, the first on the grammatical-philosophicalconcept of the essence of the sign, and the second on the grammatical-philosophical concept of the end of the tool. Then came the conclusionin the results of the study, which showed the role of grammaticalphilosophy and its differences in clarifying the nature of the functionalparts, in the specialty of each of the tools and signs with meanings thatdistinguish them from others, and the participation of tools and signs inmeanings that are granted by the unity of description (the scientific term),and the way out of this classification distinction. By applying the term(letters) to both types.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28259459.v1
Primary Topic
Linguistic, Cultural, and Literary Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Grammatical philosophy in classifying functional parts in the structures and compositions of the Arabic language

Figshare
Linguistic, Cultural, and Literary Studies
article

Grammatical philosophy in classifying functional parts in the structures and compositions of the Arabic language

article en

Abstract

Summary:This research addresses the topic of (grammatical philosophy inclassifying the functional parts in the structures and structures of thephilosophy, classification, functionalism, tools, signtopic. It is based on what came from grammatical-philosophical studieson the functional characteristics of independent and non-independentlinguistic parts, which are called tools or signs in The structures andstructures of the Arabic language, and what is known as grammaticaland syntactic signs and their letters in the words and structures of theArabic language. What is known as the grammatical and syntactic signsand their letters in the words and structures of the Arabic language. Oneof the objectives of the research is to clarify the philosophical concept offunctional parts in the Arabic language, analyze the variousphilosophical classifications of functional parts between tools and signs,and highlight the philosophical aspects affecting this classification.Which helps to know the worker and non-worker, and to know whetherhe is the worker or the effect of the worker. Explaining the types of signsin the Arabic language, in terms of their division into grammatical signs(parsing and syntactic signs), morphological signs (numerical, gender,and temporal), and verbal derivational signs (subjective, object,exaggeration, superlative, and simile). I followed the descriptive andanalytical approach in dealing with the individuals of the phenomenonunder study, and the comparative approach in comparing the doctrinesof the Basra and Kufan grammarians regarding its essence. The studywas divided into two sections, the first on the grammatical-philosophicalconcept of the essence of the sign, and the second on the grammatical-philosophical concept of the end of the tool. Then came the conclusionin the results of the study, which showed the role of grammaticalphilosophy and its differences in clarifying the nature of the functionalparts, in the specialty of each of the tools and signs with meanings thatdistinguish them from others, and the participation of tools and signs inmeanings that are granted by the unity of description (the scientific term),and the way out of this classification distinction. By applying the term(letters) to both types.

Figshare
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Linguistic, Cultural, and Literary Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.