The International Trauma Interview (ITI): development of a semi-structured diagnostic interview and evaluation in a UK sample

<b>Background:</b> The International Trauma Interview (ITI) is a structured clinician-administered measure developed to assess posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD (CPTSD) as defined in the 11th version of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). This study aimed to investigate a psychometric evaluation of the ITI and to finalise the English language version. <b>Method:</b> The latent structure, internal consistency, interrater agreement, and convergent and discriminant validity were evaluated with data from a convenience sample, drawn from an existing research cohort, of 131 trauma exposed participants from the United Kingdom reporting past diagnosis for PTSD or who had screened positively for traumatic stress symptoms. A range of self-report measures evaluating depression, panic, insomnia, dissociation, emotion dysregulation, negative cognitions about self, interpersonal functioning and general wellbeing were completed. <b>Results:</b> Confirmatory factor analysis supported an adjusted second-order two-factor model of PTSD and disturbances in self-organisation (DSO) symptoms, allowing affect dysregulation to also load onto the PTSD factor, over alternative models. The ITI scores showed acceptable internal consistency, and interrater reliability was strong. Findings for convergent and discriminant validity were mostly as predicted for PTSD and DSO domains. Correlations with the ITQ were good but coefficients for the level of agreement of PTSD diagnosis and CPTSD diagnosis between the ITI and the ITQ were weaker, and item level agreement was variable. <b>Conclusion:</b> Results provide support for the reliability and validity of the ITI as a measure of ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD. Final revisions of the ITI are described. An initial evaluation of the ITI, a diagnostic interview measure of ICD-11 PTSD/CPTSD, is presented.The latent structure of the ITI corresponds with the proposed description of ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD following an adjustment, allowing hyperactivation to load onto the PTSD factor.The ITI is a psychometrically sound clinical measure of ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD, with findings similar to those obtained in previous reports in different languages. An initial evaluation of the ITI, a diagnostic interview measure of ICD-11 PTSD/CPTSD, is presented. The latent structure of the ITI corresponds with the proposed description of ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD following an adjustment, allowing hyperactivation to load onto the PTSD factor. The ITI is a psychometrically sound clinical measure of ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD, with findings similar to those obtained in previous reports in different languages.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28937390
Primary Topic
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The International Trauma Interview (ITI): development of a semi-structured diagnostic interview and evaluation in a UK sample

Figshare
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
article

The International Trauma Interview (ITI): development of a semi-structured diagnostic interview and evaluation in a UK sample

article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> The International Trauma Interview (ITI) is a structured clinician-administered measure developed to assess posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD (CPTSD) as defined in the 11th version of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). This study aimed to investigate a psychometric evaluation of the ITI and to finalise the English language version. <b>Method:</b> The latent structure, internal consistency, interrater agreement, and convergent and discriminant validity were evaluated with data from a convenience sample, drawn from an existing research cohort, of 131 trauma exposed participants from the United Kingdom reporting past diagnosis for PTSD or who had screened positively for traumatic stress symptoms. A range of self-report measures evaluating depression, panic, insomnia, dissociation, emotion dysregulation, negative cognitions about self, interpersonal functioning and general wellbeing were completed. <b>Results:</b> Confirmatory factor analysis supported an adjusted second-order two-factor model of PTSD and disturbances in self-organisation (DSO) symptoms, allowing affect dysregulation to also load onto the PTSD factor, over alternative models. The ITI scores showed acceptable internal consistency, and interrater reliability was strong. Findings for convergent and discriminant validity were mostly as predicted for PTSD and DSO domains. Correlations with the ITQ were good but coefficients for the level of agreement of PTSD diagnosis and CPTSD diagnosis between the ITI and the ITQ were weaker, and item level agreement was variable. <b>Conclusion:</b> Results provide support for the reliability and validity of the ITI as a measure of ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD. Final revisions of the ITI are described. An initial evaluation of the ITI, a diagnostic interview measure of ICD-11 PTSD/CPTSD, is presented.The latent structure of the ITI corresponds with the proposed description of ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD following an adjustment, allowing hyperactivation to load onto the PTSD factor.The ITI is a psychometrically sound clinical measure of ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD, with findings similar to those obtained in previous reports in different languages. An initial evaluation of the ITI, a diagnostic interview measure of ICD-11 PTSD/CPTSD, is presented. The latent structure of the ITI corresponds with the proposed description of ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD following an adjustment, allowing hyperactivation to load onto the PTSD factor. The ITI is a psychometrically sound clinical measure of ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD, with findings similar to those obtained in previous reports in different languages.

Figshare
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.