A randomized, double-blind, single dose, parallel group, 2-arm study assessing the pharmacokinetic similarity, safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity profiles of biosimilar candidate AVT03 (70 mg/mL) in healthy male adults

This study (NCT05876949) compared the pharmacokinetic (PK) similarity, safety, and immunogenicity of AVT03, a candidate biosimilar, with reference product (RP) denosumab (Xgeva). Healthy male participants (<i>N</i> = 208, including 24 Japanese participants) were randomized 1:1 to receive one 120 mg dose of AVT03, or RP. PK similarity was demonstrated if the 90% confidence intervals (CI) for the ratio of geometric means for the primary PK parameters C<sub>max</sub> and AUC<sub>0-t</sub> were within 80.00% and 125.00%. Additional PK parameters included AUC<sub>0-inf</sub>, t<sub>max</sub>, K<sub>el</sub>, t<sub>1/2</sub>, V<sub>z</sub>/F, and CL/F. Safety and immunogenicity were also assessed. The 90% CIs for the ratio of geometric means for the primary PK parameters were entirely contained within the prespecified margins of 80.00% and 125.00% (C<sub>max</sub> [98.26, 110.00]; AUC<sub>0-t</sub> [102.30, 113.60]), supporting demonstration of PK similarity. Consistency between Japanese participants and the overall population was shown. Safety and immunogenicity profiles were comparable between the two treatment arms. Results supported demonstration of PK similarity between AVT03 and RP. AVT03 had a safety and immunogenicity profile comparable to RP. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (CT.gov identifier: NCT05876949); and 2022 -003,659-32 (EudraCT).

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29062248.v1
Primary Topic
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A randomized, double-blind, single dose, parallel group, 2-arm study assessing the pharmacokinetic similarity, safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity profiles of biosimilar candidate AVT03 (70 mg/mL) in healthy male adults

Figshare
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
article

A randomized, double-blind, single dose, parallel group, 2-arm study assessing the pharmacokinetic similarity, safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity profiles of biosimilar candidate AVT03 (70 mg/mL) in healthy male adults

article en

Abstract

This study (NCT05876949) compared the pharmacokinetic (PK) similarity, safety, and immunogenicity of AVT03, a candidate biosimilar, with reference product (RP) denosumab (Xgeva). Healthy male participants (<i>N</i> = 208, including 24 Japanese participants) were randomized 1:1 to receive one 120 mg dose of AVT03, or RP. PK similarity was demonstrated if the 90% confidence intervals (CI) for the ratio of geometric means for the primary PK parameters C<sub>max</sub> and AUC<sub>0-t</sub> were within 80.00% and 125.00%. Additional PK parameters included AUC<sub>0-inf</sub>, t<sub>max</sub>, K<sub>el</sub>, t<sub>1/2</sub>, V<sub>z</sub>/F, and CL/F. Safety and immunogenicity were also assessed. The 90% CIs for the ratio of geometric means for the primary PK parameters were entirely contained within the prespecified margins of 80.00% and 125.00% (C<sub>max</sub> [98.26, 110.00]; AUC<sub>0-t</sub> [102.30, 113.60]), supporting demonstration of PK similarity. Consistency between Japanese participants and the overall population was shown. Safety and immunogenicity profiles were comparable between the two treatment arms. Results supported demonstration of PK similarity between AVT03 and RP. AVT03 had a safety and immunogenicity profile comparable to RP. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (CT.gov identifier: NCT05876949); and 2022 -003,659-32 (EudraCT).

Figshare
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.