Evaluating patient-reported health outcome profiles of lower limb orthosis users

To construct self-reported health outcomes profiles of lower limb orthosis users and compare scores to a normative sample representative of the United States general population. A cross-sectional online survey, which included the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Profile v2.0 (PROMIS-29), was administered to a national sample of adult lower limb orthosis users who had at least 6 months of experience using their orthosis. Relative to the U.S. general population, the 1,036 study participants report significantly worse anxiety, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, and ability to participate in social roles and activities (all <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Differences in pain interference, physical function, and ability to participate in social roles and activities were all greater than 5 points. Subgroup analyses indicate those who also use assistive devices (e.g. canes, walkers) in addition to their orthoses generally have worse scores across multiple PROMIS domains. Results of this study indicate lower limb orthosis users, as a group, report significantly worse health outcomes than the general population. These findings highlight health constructs that may be important to assess in clinical care and research and provide references scores for this patient population. Lower limb orthosis users, as a group, report significantly worse health outcomes than the general population.Lower limb orthosis users who also use assistive devices (e.g., canes, walkers) in addition to their orthoses generally have worse scores across multiple PROMIS domains.Clinicians who are responsible for providing patient-centered orthotic interventions may wish to measure health outcomes that are generally worse for lower limb orthosis users than the general population.When providing lower limb orthotic care, clinicians should be aware that patients’ levels of anxiety, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, and ability to participate in social roles and activities may be worse than the general population. Lower limb orthosis users, as a group, report significantly worse health outcomes than the general population. Lower limb orthosis users who also use assistive devices (e.g., canes, walkers) in addition to their orthoses generally have worse scores across multiple PROMIS domains. Clinicians who are responsible for providing patient-centered orthotic interventions may wish to measure health outcomes that are generally worse for lower limb orthosis users than the general population. When providing lower limb orthotic care, clinicians should be aware that patients’ levels of anxiety, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, and ability to participate in social roles and activities may be worse than the general population.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28341924.v1
Primary Topic
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating patient-reported health outcome profiles of lower limb orthosis users

Figshare
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
article

Evaluating patient-reported health outcome profiles of lower limb orthosis users

article en

Abstract

To construct self-reported health outcomes profiles of lower limb orthosis users and compare scores to a normative sample representative of the United States general population. A cross-sectional online survey, which included the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Profile v2.0 (PROMIS-29), was administered to a national sample of adult lower limb orthosis users who had at least 6 months of experience using their orthosis. Relative to the U.S. general population, the 1,036 study participants report significantly worse anxiety, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, and ability to participate in social roles and activities (all <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Differences in pain interference, physical function, and ability to participate in social roles and activities were all greater than 5 points. Subgroup analyses indicate those who also use assistive devices (e.g. canes, walkers) in addition to their orthoses generally have worse scores across multiple PROMIS domains. Results of this study indicate lower limb orthosis users, as a group, report significantly worse health outcomes than the general population. These findings highlight health constructs that may be important to assess in clinical care and research and provide references scores for this patient population. Lower limb orthosis users, as a group, report significantly worse health outcomes than the general population.Lower limb orthosis users who also use assistive devices (e.g., canes, walkers) in addition to their orthoses generally have worse scores across multiple PROMIS domains.Clinicians who are responsible for providing patient-centered orthotic interventions may wish to measure health outcomes that are generally worse for lower limb orthosis users than the general population.When providing lower limb orthotic care, clinicians should be aware that patients’ levels of anxiety, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, and ability to participate in social roles and activities may be worse than the general population. Lower limb orthosis users, as a group, report significantly worse health outcomes than the general population. Lower limb orthosis users who also use assistive devices (e.g., canes, walkers) in addition to their orthoses generally have worse scores across multiple PROMIS domains. Clinicians who are responsible for providing patient-centered orthotic interventions may wish to measure health outcomes that are generally worse for lower limb orthosis users than the general population. When providing lower limb orthotic care, clinicians should be aware that patients’ levels of anxiety, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, and ability to participate in social roles and activities may be worse than the general population.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.