Environmental factors influencing the odds of livestock predations by wolves in North–Eastern Italy across 10 years: a network analysis approach

The recent return of the wolf <i>Canis lupus</i> has led to increasing conflicts with extensive livestock practices in shared landscapes. Using data from 2012 to 2022 on official claims for wolf damages (i.e. preyed, injured and missing livestock), this study aimed to assess the spatio–temporal dynamics of wolf damages over the past decade and identify the main environmental factors contributing to their occurrence in North–East Italy, using regression models and a network analysis. Our findings revealed an increasing trend in wolf damages and post–damage compensation payments over the years. Damages were more prevalent on sheep and goats than cattle. Furthermore, a higher frequency of surplus damages was observed at the expense of sheep and goats. The network analysis indicated a dynamic process where the expansion of the edges, i.e. connections between municipalities experiencing wolf damages each year, and their persistence overcompensated their dissolution in the following year. Expansion and stability of edges were favoured in the presence of a high number of summer farms and livestock head and in forested and fragmented landscapes, while almost nil in intensive agricultural landscapes. These results indicate that prevention strategies should be prioritised in fragmented landscapes and/or where sheep and goats, the most vulnerable categories, are predominant. Large–scale data accessible to public institutions can help predict the temporal and spatial evolution of livestock predations by wolves. They also underscore the existence of a conflictive situation in the Eastern Italian Alps, emphasising the need for better monitoring to devise mitigation actions for long–term wolf–livestock coexistence. Increasing trend of wolf damages and post–damage compensation payments across years, with higher predations on sheep and goats and lower on cattle.High numbers of summer farms and livestock in forested/fragmented landscapes favoured the expansion and spatio–temporal stability of wolf damages.Better monitoring of wolf damages–livestock systems–landscape features interactions is needed to inform effective mitigation strategies. Increasing trend of wolf damages and post–damage compensation payments across years, with higher predations on sheep and goats and lower on cattle. High numbers of summer farms and livestock in forested/fragmented landscapes favoured the expansion and spatio–temporal stability of wolf damages. Better monitoring of wolf damages–livestock systems–landscape features interactions is needed to inform effective mitigation strategies.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28710751.v1
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental factors influencing the odds of livestock predations by wolves in North–Eastern Italy across 10 years: a network analysis approach

Figshare
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Environmental factors influencing the odds of livestock predations by wolves in North–Eastern Italy across 10 years: a network analysis approach

article en

Abstract

The recent return of the wolf <i>Canis lupus</i> has led to increasing conflicts with extensive livestock practices in shared landscapes. Using data from 2012 to 2022 on official claims for wolf damages (i.e. preyed, injured and missing livestock), this study aimed to assess the spatio–temporal dynamics of wolf damages over the past decade and identify the main environmental factors contributing to their occurrence in North–East Italy, using regression models and a network analysis. Our findings revealed an increasing trend in wolf damages and post–damage compensation payments over the years. Damages were more prevalent on sheep and goats than cattle. Furthermore, a higher frequency of surplus damages was observed at the expense of sheep and goats. The network analysis indicated a dynamic process where the expansion of the edges, i.e. connections between municipalities experiencing wolf damages each year, and their persistence overcompensated their dissolution in the following year. Expansion and stability of edges were favoured in the presence of a high number of summer farms and livestock head and in forested and fragmented landscapes, while almost nil in intensive agricultural landscapes. These results indicate that prevention strategies should be prioritised in fragmented landscapes and/or where sheep and goats, the most vulnerable categories, are predominant. Large–scale data accessible to public institutions can help predict the temporal and spatial evolution of livestock predations by wolves. They also underscore the existence of a conflictive situation in the Eastern Italian Alps, emphasising the need for better monitoring to devise mitigation actions for long–term wolf–livestock coexistence. Increasing trend of wolf damages and post–damage compensation payments across years, with higher predations on sheep and goats and lower on cattle.High numbers of summer farms and livestock in forested/fragmented landscapes favoured the expansion and spatio–temporal stability of wolf damages.Better monitoring of wolf damages–livestock systems–landscape features interactions is needed to inform effective mitigation strategies. Increasing trend of wolf damages and post–damage compensation payments across years, with higher predations on sheep and goats and lower on cattle. High numbers of summer farms and livestock in forested/fragmented landscapes favoured the expansion and spatio–temporal stability of wolf damages. Better monitoring of wolf damages–livestock systems–landscape features interactions is needed to inform effective mitigation strategies.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.