Letter to the Editor: Author Response for “Why fexofenadine is considered as a truly non-sedating antihistamine with no brain penetration: a systematic review”

Letter to the Editor: Author Response for “Why fexofenadine is considered as a truly non-sedating antihistamine with no brain penetration: a systematic review”

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28740575.v1
Primary Topic
Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Letter to the Editor: Author Response for “Why fexofenadine is considered as a truly non-sedating antihistamine with no brain penetration: a systematic review”

Figshare
Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
article

Letter to the Editor: Author Response for “Why fexofenadine is considered as a truly non-sedating antihistamine with no brain penetration: a systematic review”

article en

Abstract

Letter to the Editor: Author Response for “Why fexofenadine is considered as a truly non-sedating antihistamine with no brain penetration: a systematic review”

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Letter to the Editor: Author Response for “Why fexofenadine is considered as a truly non-sedating antihistamine with no brain penetration: a systematic review” · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS