Identification of land-use conflicts: a novel framework combining scientific expertise and local stakeholders’ views

Divergent perspectives on future land-use changes, known as land-use conflicts (LUCs), significantly affect the local environment, human well-being, and sustainable development goals. However, the accurate identification and resolution of LUCs remain challenging. This study proposed a framework for LUC identification by integrating the land characteristics obtained from expert analyses with local stakeholder preferences. It outlined four types of LUCs and ten conflict combinations. The results indicated that 44.64% of the land plots exhibited at least one type of conflict. Among these, 896, 324, 115, 15, and 12 plots encountered <i>suitability</i>, <i>preference-current use</i>, <i>preference-evaluation</i>, and <i>preference-preference conflicts</i>, respectively. These findings validated the feasibility of the proposed framework and methods. Furthermore, different types of conflict combinations require different coordination rules, which indirectly reflect the complexity of conflict resolution. This framework aids the classification and identification of LUCs; offers targeted conflict resolution strategies; and contributes to informed and inclusive land-use and spatial planning.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29164231
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identification of land-use conflicts: a novel framework combining scientific expertise and local stakeholders’ views

Figshare
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

Identification of land-use conflicts: a novel framework combining scientific expertise and local stakeholders’ views

article en

Abstract

Divergent perspectives on future land-use changes, known as land-use conflicts (LUCs), significantly affect the local environment, human well-being, and sustainable development goals. However, the accurate identification and resolution of LUCs remain challenging. This study proposed a framework for LUC identification by integrating the land characteristics obtained from expert analyses with local stakeholder preferences. It outlined four types of LUCs and ten conflict combinations. The results indicated that 44.64% of the land plots exhibited at least one type of conflict. Among these, 896, 324, 115, 15, and 12 plots encountered <i>suitability</i>, <i>preference-current use</i>, <i>preference-evaluation</i>, and <i>preference-preference conflicts</i>, respectively. These findings validated the feasibility of the proposed framework and methods. Furthermore, different types of conflict combinations require different coordination rules, which indirectly reflect the complexity of conflict resolution. This framework aids the classification and identification of LUCs; offers targeted conflict resolution strategies; and contributes to informed and inclusive land-use and spatial planning.

Figshare
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Identification of land-use conflicts: a novel framework combining scientific expertise and local stakeholders’ views · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS