Additional file 1 of Numerate people are less likely to be biased by regular science reporting: the critical roles of scientific reasoning and causal misunderstanding

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29323741
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Additional file 1 of Numerate people are less likely to be biased by regular science reporting: the critical roles of scientific reasoning and causal misunderstanding

Figshare
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
article

Additional file 1 of Numerate people are less likely to be biased by regular science reporting: the critical roles of scientific reasoning and causal misunderstanding

article en

Abstract

No abstract available for this paper.
Figshare
University of Southern California (US), Universidad de Granada (ES), California Southern University (US), Clemson University (US), University of Oklahoma (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Additional file 1 of Numerate people are less likely to be biased by regular science reporting: the critical roles of scientific reasoning and causal misunderstanding · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS