Epidemiology of Consumer Product-Related Ocular Injuries in the Incarcerated Population

To characterize the epidemiology of consumer product-related ocular injury in the United States (US) incarcerated population, and identify preventable causes. The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) database was queried for cases of eye injury from 2014 to 2023. Incarcerated cases were identified using the keywords “prison”, “jail”, “inmate”, and “incarcerate”. Year of injury, diagnosis, product code, and demographic information were gathered and compared between the incarcerated and general US populations using SPSS version 29 (IBM Corp.). A narrative analysis categorized cases of ocular trauma in the incarcerated by common causes of injury. Between 2014 and 2023, there were an estimated 1,644,841 cases of consumer-product related ocular injury the US, with 2683 cases occurring in the incarcerated. A higher percentage of ocular injury cases in the incarcerated involved African American individuals (43.42% vs. 17.18%), males (92.22% vs 68.54%), alcohol use (4.11% vs. 0.64%), drug use (3.91% vs. 0.82%), and hospitalization (4.96% vs. 1.39%). Contusions were less common in the incarcerated population (27.21% vs. 41.31%), while foreign body injuries were more common (24.38% vs. 18.75%). Penal labor, including cleaning (13.74%), welding (8.25%), yardwork (5.92%), and power grinding (5.72%), accounted for 36.36% of injuries. 26.50% of injuries were sports-related, with basketball involved in 16.82%. The epidemiology of ocular injury in the incarcerated differs from the general US population. Penal labor and sports-related ocular injury represent a majority of cases, underscoring the need for protective eyewear.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28172391
Primary Topic
Plant pathogens and resistance mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Epidemiology of Consumer Product-Related Ocular Injuries in the Incarcerated Population

Figshare
Plant pathogens and resistance mechanisms
article

Epidemiology of Consumer Product-Related Ocular Injuries in the Incarcerated Population

article en

Abstract

To characterize the epidemiology of consumer product-related ocular injury in the United States (US) incarcerated population, and identify preventable causes. The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) database was queried for cases of eye injury from 2014 to 2023. Incarcerated cases were identified using the keywords “prison”, “jail”, “inmate”, and “incarcerate”. Year of injury, diagnosis, product code, and demographic information were gathered and compared between the incarcerated and general US populations using SPSS version 29 (IBM Corp.). A narrative analysis categorized cases of ocular trauma in the incarcerated by common causes of injury. Between 2014 and 2023, there were an estimated 1,644,841 cases of consumer-product related ocular injury the US, with 2683 cases occurring in the incarcerated. A higher percentage of ocular injury cases in the incarcerated involved African American individuals (43.42% vs. 17.18%), males (92.22% vs 68.54%), alcohol use (4.11% vs. 0.64%), drug use (3.91% vs. 0.82%), and hospitalization (4.96% vs. 1.39%). Contusions were less common in the incarcerated population (27.21% vs. 41.31%), while foreign body injuries were more common (24.38% vs. 18.75%). Penal labor, including cleaning (13.74%), welding (8.25%), yardwork (5.92%), and power grinding (5.72%), accounted for 36.36% of injuries. 26.50% of injuries were sports-related, with basketball involved in 16.82%. The epidemiology of ocular injury in the incarcerated differs from the general US population. Penal labor and sports-related ocular injury represent a majority of cases, underscoring the need for protective eyewear.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Plant pathogens and resistance mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.