Managing for resilience through ecological structure: Examples of portfolio effects in the Great Lakes Basin

Resilient ecosystems maintain stability and function through dynamic processes like portfolio effects, wherein differential species’ responses to their environment create stability in aggregate. Portfolio effects occur within and across spatial and biological scales, creating opportunities for mobile consumers to switch resources and habitats adaptively under changing conditions. In this table, we document portfolio effects in the Great Lakes Basin, (GLB) showing that they structure resilience through adaptive capacity for a diversity of species and habitat types, with consequences that propagate through food webs from the scale of within- macrohabitats and ecosystems to coupling aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems across landscapes<i>.</i> However, our examples simultaneously demonstrate how anthropogenic perturbations and other global changes have likely eroded this adaptive capacity and therefore ecosystem resilience. Relevant definitions: <b><i>Resilience.</i></b> The capacity to <b><i>resist</i></b> perturbations, <b><i>recover</i></b> from perturbations back to its initial state, and to <b><i>reorganize</i></b> (i.e., to adapt) following perturbations to maintain functions. ‘State’ is meant broadly – it may be dynamic and preserved through dynamic processes rather than at a classically locally stable equilibrium (i.e., with all species maintaining or returning to constant density).<b><i>Portfolio effects.</i></b> Reduced <i>temporal variability</i> of an aggregate ecological function (e.g., total biomass, density, productivity, or consumption rate) compared to the variability of the individual component parts. Portfolio effects emerge due to <i>response diversity</i> among entities at any level of the biological hierarchy, from genotypes to trophic groups.<b><i>Adaptive capacity.</i></b><b><i> </i></b>The potential for a system to <i>reorganize</i> to maintain key functions. Reorganization may occur at any scale because the dynamics of smaller-scale components initiate the emergence of system-level functions that feedback to affect the component parts.Examples include not only the potential for evolutionary adaptation, but also behavioral changes, spatiotemporal re-patterning, and restructuring of carbon pathways in ecosystems.<br><br><br>

Publication Details

Journal
OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28304093.v1
Primary Topic
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Managing for resilience through ecological structure: Examples of portfolio effects in the Great Lakes Basin

OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
article

Managing for resilience through ecological structure: Examples of portfolio effects in the Great Lakes Basin

article en

Abstract

Resilient ecosystems maintain stability and function through dynamic processes like portfolio effects, wherein differential species’ responses to their environment create stability in aggregate. Portfolio effects occur within and across spatial and biological scales, creating opportunities for mobile consumers to switch resources and habitats adaptively under changing conditions. In this table, we document portfolio effects in the Great Lakes Basin, (GLB) showing that they structure resilience through adaptive capacity for a diversity of species and habitat types, with consequences that propagate through food webs from the scale of within- macrohabitats and ecosystems to coupling aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems across landscapes<i>.</i> However, our examples simultaneously demonstrate how anthropogenic perturbations and other global changes have likely eroded this adaptive capacity and therefore ecosystem resilience. Relevant definitions: <b><i>Resilience.</i></b> The capacity to <b><i>resist</i></b> perturbations, <b><i>recover</i></b> from perturbations back to its initial state, and to <b><i>reorganize</i></b> (i.e., to adapt) following perturbations to maintain functions. ‘State’ is meant broadly – it may be dynamic and preserved through dynamic processes rather than at a classically locally stable equilibrium (i.e., with all species maintaining or returning to constant density).<b><i>Portfolio effects.</i></b> Reduced <i>temporal variability</i> of an aggregate ecological function (e.g., total biomass, density, productivity, or consumption rate) compared to the variability of the individual component parts. Portfolio effects emerge due to <i>response diversity</i> among entities at any level of the biological hierarchy, from genotypes to trophic groups.<b><i>Adaptive capacity.</i></b><b><i> </i></b>The potential for a system to <i>reorganize</i> to maintain key functions. Reorganization may occur at any scale because the dynamics of smaller-scale components initiate the emergence of system-level functions that feedback to affect the component parts.Examples include not only the potential for evolutionary adaptation, but also behavioral changes, spatiotemporal re-patterning, and restructuring of carbon pathways in ecosystems.<br><br><br>

OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Managing for resilience through ecological structure: Examples of portfolio effects in the Great Lakes Basin · OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS