Additional file 4 of Antero-posterior patterning in the brittle star Amphipholis squamata and the evolution of echinoderm body plans

Additional file 4: Fig. 4. Phylogenetic trees of Amphipholis squamata orthologues. Phylogenetic relationship of Amphipholis squamata genes investigated in this study. A, Hox phylogeny. B, ANTP class homeobox transcription factors phylogeny. C, PRD class homeobox transcription factors phylogeny. D, Zic transcription factors phylogeny. E, SINE and TALE class homeobox transcription factors phylogeny. F, Myosin Heavy Chains phylogeny. G, Elav RNA binding proteins phylogeny. H, Hedgehog ligands phylogeny. I, Frizzled and secreted frizzled receptors phylogeny. Phylo­genetic trees are based on sequences from mouse, amphioxus, hemichordate, echinoids, asteroid, ophiuroidand polychaete. GenBank accession numbers are indicated between brackets. Trees were calculated using both Maximum Likelihoodand Bayesian Inferencemethods. Only the MLor BItrees are shown, with branch lengths being representative of sequence substitution rates, and branch support indicated as posterior probabilities from the BI analysis/bootstrap percentages from the ML analysis. “–” indicates that the branching patterns of the ML and BI analyses diverged at this node.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29206471
Primary Topic
Echinoderm biology and ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Additional file 4 of Antero-posterior patterning in the brittle star Amphipholis squamata and the evolution of echinoderm body plans

Figshare
Echinoderm biology and ecology
article

Additional file 4 of Antero-posterior patterning in the brittle star Amphipholis squamata and the evolution of echinoderm body plans

article en

Abstract

Additional file 4: Fig. 4. Phylogenetic trees of Amphipholis squamata orthologues. Phylogenetic relationship of Amphipholis squamata genes investigated in this study. A, Hox phylogeny. B, ANTP class homeobox transcription factors phylogeny. C, PRD class homeobox transcription factors phylogeny. D, Zic transcription factors phylogeny. E, SINE and TALE class homeobox transcription factors phylogeny. F, Myosin Heavy Chains phylogeny. G, Elav RNA binding proteins phylogeny. H, Hedgehog ligands phylogeny. I, Frizzled and secreted frizzled receptors phylogeny. Phylo­genetic trees are based on sequences from mouse, amphioxus, hemichordate, echinoids, asteroid, ophiuroidand polychaete. GenBank accession numbers are indicated between brackets. Trees were calculated using both Maximum Likelihoodand Bayesian Inferencemethods. Only the MLor BItrees are shown, with branch lengths being representative of sequence substitution rates, and branch support indicated as posterior probabilities from the BI analysis/bootstrap percentages from the ML analysis. “–” indicates that the branching patterns of the ML and BI analyses diverged at this node.

Figshare
Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (JP), Chan Zuckerberg Biohub San Francisco (US), Pacific Biosciences (United States) (US), University of California, Berkeley (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Echinoderm biology and ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Additional file 4 of Antero-posterior patterning in the brittle star Amphipholis squamata and the evolution of echinoderm body plans · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS