The Network Structure of Environmental Justice Social Movements: A Case Study in the California Delta

An environmental justice (EJ) movement involves groups collectively organizing to mobilize resources and participate in the policy process to address disproportionate environmental burdens. Networks of relationships among EJ groups and their partners shape the effectiveness of an EJ movement to influence policy and decision-making. Drawing from the social movement literature, we examined why EJ groups build intentional partnerships on the basis of exchanging resources and working with groups that share similar missions. Examining data from 21 EJ groups in the California Delta, we find evidence of both homophily and heterophily in shaping relationships. EJ groups are drawn to partners with shared priorities and geographic proximity, while also seeking the benefits of partnering with more popular, or brokering, organizations that connect them to a broader network. This suggests that EJ social movements feature a mixture of bridging and bonding social capital, providing different types of benefits for supporting collective action.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29644947.v1
Primary Topic
Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Network Structure of Environmental Justice Social Movements: A Case Study in the California Delta

Figshare
Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
article

The Network Structure of Environmental Justice Social Movements: A Case Study in the California Delta

article en

Abstract

An environmental justice (EJ) movement involves groups collectively organizing to mobilize resources and participate in the policy process to address disproportionate environmental burdens. Networks of relationships among EJ groups and their partners shape the effectiveness of an EJ movement to influence policy and decision-making. Drawing from the social movement literature, we examined why EJ groups build intentional partnerships on the basis of exchanging resources and working with groups that share similar missions. Examining data from 21 EJ groups in the California Delta, we find evidence of both homophily and heterophily in shaping relationships. EJ groups are drawn to partners with shared priorities and geographic proximity, while also seeking the benefits of partnering with more popular, or brokering, organizations that connect them to a broader network. This suggests that EJ social movements feature a mixture of bridging and bonding social capital, providing different types of benefits for supporting collective action.

Figshare
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.