What do measures of authoritarianism measure? An examination of the factor structure underlying modern measures of authoritarianism

Authoritarianism is broadly characterized as a psychological predisposition to submit to authority, behave punitively toward perceived dissenters, and prefer social control. Although psychological research on authoritarianism has been prolific since at least the early 20th century, the scope had been limited to right-wing authoritarianism until the last decade. This newer work on left-wing authoritarianism has demonstrated that authoritarianism does in fact exist across the political spectrum. Thus, an old question has been raised once more: Is there a psychological structure underlying authoritarianism that is independent from the left-right ideological dichotomy and that could be shared between those high in right-wing and left-wing authoritarianism? This thesis is the first step in reaching the future goal of developing a measure of ideologically-neutral authoritarianism. The two studies herein consist of collected responses to existing measurements of authoritarianism and related constructs like political intolerance from a sample of 2,026 U.S. adults and a sample of 587 Rutgers psychology undergraduate students. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted in an attempt to ascertain whether elements of authoritarianism were shared between those on the political left and right.

Publication Details

Journal
Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7282/t3-xvsn-zr21
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What do measures of authoritarianism measure? An examination of the factor structure underlying modern measures of authoritarianism

Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University)
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

What do measures of authoritarianism measure? An examination of the factor structure underlying modern measures of authoritarianism

article en

Abstract

Authoritarianism is broadly characterized as a psychological predisposition to submit to authority, behave punitively toward perceived dissenters, and prefer social control. Although psychological research on authoritarianism has been prolific since at least the early 20th century, the scope had been limited to right-wing authoritarianism until the last decade. This newer work on left-wing authoritarianism has demonstrated that authoritarianism does in fact exist across the political spectrum. Thus, an old question has been raised once more: Is there a psychological structure underlying authoritarianism that is independent from the left-right ideological dichotomy and that could be shared between those high in right-wing and left-wing authoritarianism? This thesis is the first step in reaching the future goal of developing a measure of ideologically-neutral authoritarianism. The two studies herein consist of collected responses to existing measurements of authoritarianism and related constructs like political intolerance from a sample of 2,026 U.S. adults and a sample of 587 Rutgers psychology undergraduate students. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted in an attempt to ascertain whether elements of authoritarianism were shared between those on the political left and right.

Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.