<sub>The Rise and Fall of Nokia: An Important Lesson</sub>

Nokia’s failure to follow the market trend towards the end of the 2000s was the final nail in the coffin for this company. They were unable to maintain their lead until they were left out of the competition in the smartphone industry. This paper examines the contributing factors to Nokia’s rise and falls and attempts to assess the internal and external threats that constrained Nokia’s progress in the industry using the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT) Analysis and Porter’s Five Force Model External Analysis from 2005 until 2014. There has already been vast research carried out regarding Nokia, resulting in a voluminous body of literature about this topic. To make this study different from the existing study, an analysis based on the two different models as guidelines, supported by previous literature. In SWOT Analysis, the outcome shows there was a greater preference for Weaknesses and Threats faced by Nokia compared to Strengths and Opportunities. Porter’s Five Force Model External Analysis indicates that Nokia faced no issues except for the threat of entry. The rest of the components, namely, the bargaining power of buyers, the threat of substitute products, the bargaining power of suppliers, and industry competitors’ rivalry among existing firms, did not show any severe threat to Nokia. Limitations and future research recommendations are also discussed in the paper.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29482112
Primary Topic
Strategic Planning and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Rise and Fall of Nokia: An Important Lesson

Figshare
Strategic Planning and Analysis
article

The Rise and Fall of Nokia: An Important Lesson

article en

Abstract

Nokia’s failure to follow the market trend towards the end of the 2000s was the final nail in the coffin for this company. They were unable to maintain their lead until they were left out of the competition in the smartphone industry. This paper examines the contributing factors to Nokia’s rise and falls and attempts to assess the internal and external threats that constrained Nokia’s progress in the industry using the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT) Analysis and Porter’s Five Force Model External Analysis from 2005 until 2014. There has already been vast research carried out regarding Nokia, resulting in a voluminous body of literature about this topic. To make this study different from the existing study, an analysis based on the two different models as guidelines, supported by previous literature. In SWOT Analysis, the outcome shows there was a greater preference for Weaknesses and Threats faced by Nokia compared to Strengths and Opportunities. Porter’s Five Force Model External Analysis indicates that Nokia faced no issues except for the threat of entry. The rest of the components, namely, the bargaining power of buyers, the threat of substitute products, the bargaining power of suppliers, and industry competitors’ rivalry among existing firms, did not show any severe threat to Nokia. Limitations and future research recommendations are also discussed in the paper.

Figshare
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Strategic Planning and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.