Simulating Variability-Induced Learning Biases Using MaxEnt Grammars

Recent work by Do and colleagues (e.g., Do and Mooney, 2022; Huang and Do, 2023) suggests that learning biases towards vowel harmony over vowel disharmony are more likely to emerge under variable learning conditions. However, it is unclear whether or how such a reliance on substantive grounding might be implemented formally, such as with MaxEnt learning models of Harmonic Grammar (Goldwater and Johnson, 2003; Hayes and Wilson, 2008). The present study makes use of the MaxEnt Grammar Learning Tool (Hayes et al., 2009) to explore whether and when learning biases are more likely to emerge under variable vs. categorical training data. The results of four sets of simulations demonstrate that MaxEnt Grammars can simulate a stronger learning bias for vowel harmony over disharmony under variable conditions, but only when the bias towards harmony was put into the initial prior weight (μ). These results support the hypothesis that human learning biases may be more sensitive to variability. Learners may rely more on prior/substantively grounded biases in the face of ambiguous or conflicting evidence, such as a variable rule or pattern.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
University of Massachusetts (UMass) Amherst
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7275/amphonology.3045
Primary Topic
Phonetics and Phonology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Simulating Variability-Induced Learning Biases Using MaxEnt Grammars

University of Massachusetts (UMass) Amherst
Phonetics and Phonology Research
article

Simulating Variability-Induced Learning Biases Using MaxEnt Grammars

article en

Abstract

Recent work by Do and colleagues (e.g., Do and Mooney, 2022; Huang and Do, 2023) suggests that learning biases towards vowel harmony over vowel disharmony are more likely to emerge under variable learning conditions. However, it is unclear whether or how such a reliance on substantive grounding might be implemented formally, such as with MaxEnt learning models of Harmonic Grammar (Goldwater and Johnson, 2003; Hayes and Wilson, 2008). The present study makes use of the MaxEnt Grammar Learning Tool (Hayes et al., 2009) to explore whether and when learning biases are more likely to emerge under variable vs. categorical training data. The results of four sets of simulations demonstrate that MaxEnt Grammars can simulate a stronger learning bias for vowel harmony over disharmony under variable conditions, but only when the bias towards harmony was put into the initial prior weight (μ). These results support the hypothesis that human learning biases may be more sensitive to variability. Learners may rely more on prior/substantively grounded biases in the face of ambiguous or conflicting evidence, such as a variable rule or pattern.

University of Massachusetts (UMass) Amherst
Pacific Lutheran University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Phonetics and Phonology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.