Polarization, fragmentation, and democratic deconsolidation in interwar Europe

Around the world, democracy seems to be under threat. Polarization is considered a key culprit. In this study, we return the focus to ideological party system polarization, which we conceptualize as multidimensional, encompassing different policy dimensions. Theoretically, we argue that the effect of polarization on democracy is neither linear nor unconditional: Both high and low levels of polarization have deleterious consequences for democracy, particularly at low levels of fragmentation. When voters cannot meaningfully distinguish between government and opposition, democracies are as threatened as when political opponents represent fundamentally different ideologies. Finally, we introduce novel data on election outcomes and party positions in 25 European interwar democracies, an understudied period in which many Western democracies failed. Our observational analysis supports the predicted inverted U-curve relationship between ideological polarization and democracy, as well as its conditional nature on low party fragmentation.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29919750.v1
Primary Topic
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Polarization, fragmentation, and democratic deconsolidation in interwar Europe

Figshare
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
article

Polarization, fragmentation, and democratic deconsolidation in interwar Europe

article en

Abstract

Around the world, democracy seems to be under threat. Polarization is considered a key culprit. In this study, we return the focus to ideological party system polarization, which we conceptualize as multidimensional, encompassing different policy dimensions. Theoretically, we argue that the effect of polarization on democracy is neither linear nor unconditional: Both high and low levels of polarization have deleterious consequences for democracy, particularly at low levels of fragmentation. When voters cannot meaningfully distinguish between government and opposition, democracies are as threatened as when political opponents represent fundamentally different ideologies. Finally, we introduce novel data on election outcomes and party positions in 25 European interwar democracies, an understudied period in which many Western democracies failed. Our observational analysis supports the predicted inverted U-curve relationship between ideological polarization and democracy, as well as its conditional nature on low party fragmentation.

Figshare
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.