Table S5. Information on specimens from The gnathosoma is a bad character rather than evidence for mite monophyly

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28681550.v2
Primary Topic
Study of Mite Species
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Table S5. Information on specimens from The gnathosoma is a bad character rather than evidence for mite monophyly

Figshare
Study of Mite Species
article

Table S5. Information on specimens from The gnathosoma is a bad character rather than evidence for mite monophyly

article en

Abstract

No abstract available for this paper.
Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Study of Mite Species
DOISourceOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Table S5. Information on specimens from The gnathosoma is a bad character rather than evidence for mite monophyly · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS