Policy over votes: why extreme governments respond to their supporters

Responsive government means changes in policy reflect changes in citizen preferences. But which citizens? This study examines that question through the lens of policymakers’ incentives to respond to their supporters, the preferences of which are at odds with those of the mean voter about one-third of the time. The article argues that policymaker incentives depend on the government’s position in policy space. Relative to centrist governments, both vote- and policy-seeking motivations push extreme governments to deliver for their supporters over the electorate at large. Analyses of public opinion surveys and policy outputs across 15 countries over 40 years provide support for this expectation. The viability of a supporter-targeted strategy, however, is not sustainable: findings show extreme governments <i>lose</i> votes when they respond to their supporters. The implication is that policy, and not votes, drives behaviour for non-centrist governments. Study findings advance our understanding of how government extremism matters for opinion–policy linkages.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29126995.v1
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Policy over votes: why extreme governments respond to their supporters

Figshare
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

Policy over votes: why extreme governments respond to their supporters

article en

Abstract

Responsive government means changes in policy reflect changes in citizen preferences. But which citizens? This study examines that question through the lens of policymakers’ incentives to respond to their supporters, the preferences of which are at odds with those of the mean voter about one-third of the time. The article argues that policymaker incentives depend on the government’s position in policy space. Relative to centrist governments, both vote- and policy-seeking motivations push extreme governments to deliver for their supporters over the electorate at large. Analyses of public opinion surveys and policy outputs across 15 countries over 40 years provide support for this expectation. The viability of a supporter-targeted strategy, however, is not sustainable: findings show extreme governments <i>lose</i> votes when they respond to their supporters. The implication is that policy, and not votes, drives behaviour for non-centrist governments. Study findings advance our understanding of how government extremism matters for opinion–policy linkages.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Policy over votes: why extreme governments respond to their supporters · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS