A multi-sectoral scoping review of co-design theoretical models

Co-design is the involvement of end-users in program, or product development, ensuring that they are suitable for the communities they are intended for. Co-design can be underpinned by theoretical frameworks, or ‘models’. The objective of this scoping review is to map evidence relating to how co-design models have been used, with the guiding questions: ‘What are the co-design models described in the literature?’, ‘How are they implemented?’, and ‘What are their outcomes?’ The JBI methodology for evidence synthesis: Scoping Reviews protocol guided this review. A search of CINAHL, MedLine, SCOPUS, and ERIC databases was conducted, with supplementary searching via the CLUES method. The search strategy yielded 6287 references from databases, and 48 from supplementary searching, with 62 studies included after screening and application of inclusion criteria. Overall, 26 different co-design models were identified. Though co-design models offer a structured approach, their suitability can differ according to the context of application, and may need to be adapted to specific research settings. This review provides guidance for researchers seeking to use a co-design model that will best support their research.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29891429.v1
Primary Topic
Enzyme Structure and Function
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A multi-sectoral scoping review of co-design theoretical models

Figshare
Enzyme Structure and Function
article

A multi-sectoral scoping review of co-design theoretical models

article en

Abstract

Co-design is the involvement of end-users in program, or product development, ensuring that they are suitable for the communities they are intended for. Co-design can be underpinned by theoretical frameworks, or ‘models’. The objective of this scoping review is to map evidence relating to how co-design models have been used, with the guiding questions: ‘What are the co-design models described in the literature?’, ‘How are they implemented?’, and ‘What are their outcomes?’ The JBI methodology for evidence synthesis: Scoping Reviews protocol guided this review. A search of CINAHL, MedLine, SCOPUS, and ERIC databases was conducted, with supplementary searching via the CLUES method. The search strategy yielded 6287 references from databases, and 48 from supplementary searching, with 62 studies included after screening and application of inclusion criteria. Overall, 26 different co-design models were identified. Though co-design models offer a structured approach, their suitability can differ according to the context of application, and may need to be adapted to specific research settings. This review provides guidance for researchers seeking to use a co-design model that will best support their research.

Figshare
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Enzyme Structure and Function
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A multi-sectoral scoping review of co-design theoretical models · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS