Estimating methane emissions from the waste sector in Southern Ontario using atmospheric measurements

We estimate methane emissions for urban waste treatment facilities from mobile in situ atmospheric concentration measurements using an inverse Gaussian plume methodology at facilities in Southern Ontario, Canada. We use these emission rates to assess and improve the existing high-resolution methane inventories for waste sources throughout Southwestern Ontario. Our measurements encompass tens of thousands of kilometres worth of mobile survey data collected over 7 years, including more than 650 downwind transects where we surveyed 14 active landfills, 11 closed landfills, 2 organic waste processing facilities, 3 open-air windrow compost facilities, and 11 water resource recovery facilities. These sources account for 77% of the active landfills within Southern Ontario, which is estimated in inventories to be the largest source of methane emissions in the region. Within the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) megacity, the measured facilities represent about 52% of the total inventoried non-wetland methane emissions. We find that emissions from closed landfills are lower than inventory estimates, with significant implications for the methane budget in the GTA. We update the Facility Level and Area Methane Emissions for the GTA inventory with our measured emissions rates, which results in a 54% decline in the solid waste emissions, effecting a 35% lower estimate for the total anthropogenic methane emissions in the region. We attribute the bulk of this difference to a single facility: the Keele Valley landfill. Our atmospheric measurements serve as a metric for evaluating the discrepancies between four facility level and two high resolution gridded methane emission inventories. We find that the facility level first-order decay model maintained by Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) to be the most consistent with our measured emission rates at landfills, and the self-reported emissions to the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program of ECCC to be the least consistent with our measurements. <i>Implications:</i> We present estimates of atmospheric measurement derived methane emissions for multiple waste processing facilities in Canada. We investigate six emission inventories and models. Based on our atmospheric observations of landfills, we show that the self-reported methane emissions are not well correlated with our measured emissions, and that the first order decay models used in official emissions reporting are much better correlated. One of the most critical findings in this work is that methane emissions from the Keele Valley Landfill, assumed in some inventories to be the second largest anthropogenic source of methane in the country, are significantly less than predicted.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28181016
Primary Topic
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating methane emissions from the waste sector in Southern Ontario using atmospheric measurements

Figshare
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
article

Estimating methane emissions from the waste sector in Southern Ontario using atmospheric measurements

article en

Abstract

We estimate methane emissions for urban waste treatment facilities from mobile in situ atmospheric concentration measurements using an inverse Gaussian plume methodology at facilities in Southern Ontario, Canada. We use these emission rates to assess and improve the existing high-resolution methane inventories for waste sources throughout Southwestern Ontario. Our measurements encompass tens of thousands of kilometres worth of mobile survey data collected over 7 years, including more than 650 downwind transects where we surveyed 14 active landfills, 11 closed landfills, 2 organic waste processing facilities, 3 open-air windrow compost facilities, and 11 water resource recovery facilities. These sources account for 77% of the active landfills within Southern Ontario, which is estimated in inventories to be the largest source of methane emissions in the region. Within the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) megacity, the measured facilities represent about 52% of the total inventoried non-wetland methane emissions. We find that emissions from closed landfills are lower than inventory estimates, with significant implications for the methane budget in the GTA. We update the Facility Level and Area Methane Emissions for the GTA inventory with our measured emissions rates, which results in a 54% decline in the solid waste emissions, effecting a 35% lower estimate for the total anthropogenic methane emissions in the region. We attribute the bulk of this difference to a single facility: the Keele Valley landfill. Our atmospheric measurements serve as a metric for evaluating the discrepancies between four facility level and two high resolution gridded methane emission inventories. We find that the facility level first-order decay model maintained by Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) to be the most consistent with our measured emission rates at landfills, and the self-reported emissions to the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program of ECCC to be the least consistent with our measurements. <i>Implications:</i> We present estimates of atmospheric measurement derived methane emissions for multiple waste processing facilities in Canada. We investigate six emission inventories and models. Based on our atmospheric observations of landfills, we show that the self-reported methane emissions are not well correlated with our measured emissions, and that the first order decay models used in official emissions reporting are much better correlated. One of the most critical findings in this work is that methane emissions from the Keele Valley Landfill, assumed in some inventories to be the second largest anthropogenic source of methane in the country, are significantly less than predicted.

Figshare
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.