Gamma-hydroxybutyrate poisoning: clinical diagnosis versus laboratory findings

Patients poisoned with gamma-hydroxybutyrate may need urgent medical treatment. The clinical manifestations are heterogeneous, and the level of consciousness is often unstable, with fluctuations between agitation and coma. We aimed to investigate the accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of gamma-hydroxybutyrate poisoning compared to laboratory findings in blood samples. We did a prospective observational study, including patients ≥16 years of age admitted to hospital with a clinical diagnosis of gamma-hydroxybutyrate poisoning. The diagnosis was established by the doctor treating the patient based on the clinical information and/or information from the patient and/or the patient’s companions. Blood samples were taken at admission and analyzed using ultra high-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. There were 87 patients with a median age of 35 years (IQR: 30–42 years), and 58.6% (51/87) were male. Gamma-hydroxybutyrate was found in blood samples taken from 60 (69.0%) patients. The median Glasgow Coma Scale of all patients on arrival at hospital was 6 (IQR: 3–10), and 53.3% of the patients who tested positive for gamma-hydroxybutyrate presented with a Glasgow Coma Scale of 3. The Glasgow Coma Scale was significantly lower (<i>P</i> &lt;0.001) among patients who tested positive for gamma-hydroxybutyrate, and was inversely correlated with gamma-hydroxybutyrate concentrations. Among the 60 patients testing positive for gamma-hydroxybutyrate, 28 (46.7%) needed treatment in an intensive care unit, and three (5.0%) required endotracheal intubation. In 58 (96.7%) of the 60 patients who tested positive for gamma-hydroxybutyrate, other drugs were also found, most frequently amfetamines, cocaine, and benzodiazepines. The frequent co-consumption of other psychoactive drugs makes the clinical diagnosis of gamma-hydroxybutyrate challenging, and poisoning with other central nervous system depressants was frequently observed among those patients testing negative for the gamma-hydroxybutyrate. In only two out of three patients with clinically suspected gamma-hydroxybutyrate poisoning was gamma-hydroxybutyrate found in a blood sample, indicating that clinicians might overdiagnose gamma-hydroxybutyrate poisoning.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28956213.v1
Primary Topic
Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gamma-hydroxybutyrate poisoning: clinical diagnosis versus laboratory findings

Figshare
Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
article

Gamma-hydroxybutyrate poisoning: clinical diagnosis versus laboratory findings

article en

Abstract

Patients poisoned with gamma-hydroxybutyrate may need urgent medical treatment. The clinical manifestations are heterogeneous, and the level of consciousness is often unstable, with fluctuations between agitation and coma. We aimed to investigate the accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of gamma-hydroxybutyrate poisoning compared to laboratory findings in blood samples. We did a prospective observational study, including patients ≥16 years of age admitted to hospital with a clinical diagnosis of gamma-hydroxybutyrate poisoning. The diagnosis was established by the doctor treating the patient based on the clinical information and/or information from the patient and/or the patient’s companions. Blood samples were taken at admission and analyzed using ultra high-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. There were 87 patients with a median age of 35 years (IQR: 30–42 years), and 58.6% (51/87) were male. Gamma-hydroxybutyrate was found in blood samples taken from 60 (69.0%) patients. The median Glasgow Coma Scale of all patients on arrival at hospital was 6 (IQR: 3–10), and 53.3% of the patients who tested positive for gamma-hydroxybutyrate presented with a Glasgow Coma Scale of 3. The Glasgow Coma Scale was significantly lower (<i>P</i> &lt;0.001) among patients who tested positive for gamma-hydroxybutyrate, and was inversely correlated with gamma-hydroxybutyrate concentrations. Among the 60 patients testing positive for gamma-hydroxybutyrate, 28 (46.7%) needed treatment in an intensive care unit, and three (5.0%) required endotracheal intubation. In 58 (96.7%) of the 60 patients who tested positive for gamma-hydroxybutyrate, other drugs were also found, most frequently amfetamines, cocaine, and benzodiazepines. The frequent co-consumption of other psychoactive drugs makes the clinical diagnosis of gamma-hydroxybutyrate challenging, and poisoning with other central nervous system depressants was frequently observed among those patients testing negative for the gamma-hydroxybutyrate. In only two out of three patients with clinically suspected gamma-hydroxybutyrate poisoning was gamma-hydroxybutyrate found in a blood sample, indicating that clinicians might overdiagnose gamma-hydroxybutyrate poisoning.

Figshare
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.