<b>Definitions and criticisms of “academic productivism” on SciELO: A meta-research about Social Sciences and Humanities</b>

<b>Abstract</b>The notion of "academic productivism" refers to the pressure experienced by researchers to publish at an accelerated pace to meet institutional demands. This study proposes a content analysis of 58 articles published on the topic in the SciELO Brazil platform between 2008 and 2024. We emphasize four dimensions: definitions of productivism; criticisms toward the current evaluation model; impacts on the physical and mental health of researchers; and proposals for solutions and improvements to evaluate intellectual production. The results highlight the criticisms of assessments based on the quantity of publications, but there is little discussion of alternatives to reform such a system.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28661396
Primary Topic
Science and Science Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Definitions and criticisms of “academic productivism” on SciELO: A meta-research about Social Sciences and Humanities

Figshare
Science and Science Education
article

Definitions and criticisms of “academic productivism” on SciELO: A meta-research about Social Sciences and Humanities

article en

Abstract

<b>Abstract</b>The notion of "academic productivism" refers to the pressure experienced by researchers to publish at an accelerated pace to meet institutional demands. This study proposes a content analysis of 58 articles published on the topic in the SciELO Brazil platform between 2008 and 2024. We emphasize four dimensions: definitions of productivism; criticisms toward the current evaluation model; impacts on the physical and mental health of researchers; and proposals for solutions and improvements to evaluate intellectual production. The results highlight the criticisms of assessments based on the quantity of publications, but there is little discussion of alternatives to reform such a system.

Figshare
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Science and Science Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

<b>Definitions and criticisms of “academic productivism” on SciELO: A meta-research about Social Sciences and Humanities</b> · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS