Performance of AEB systems in preventing car-pedestrian collisions

This study quantifies the performance of autonomous emergency braking (AEB) systems in preventing car-pedestrian collisions in Japan. The study uses data on Japanese traffic accidents compiled by Japan’s National Police Agency, restricting the analysis to collisions for which we could determine whether the primary party’s car was equipped with an AEB system. Poisson mixed-effects regression analyses are conducted using data for 2022 and 2023 to quantify the collision avoidance performance of cars that were first registered in 2021 and equipped with AEB systems compared with cars without AEB systems that were first registered in 2015 or 2016. Our analysis of collisions of all injury levels reveals that AEB-equipped cars that were first registered in 2021 had 12.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.2%–18.0%) fewer accidents than non-AEB-equipped cars that were first registered in 2015 or 2016. The reduction for fatal and serious injury collisions alone was higher, at 15.6% (95% CI 2.2%–27.2%). A day/night analysis demonstrates a 7.6% (95% CI −0.9%–15.3%; ns) reduction in daytime collisions and a 19.0% (95% CI 9.9%–27.1%) reduction in nighttime collisions. Analysis of three car-pedestrian collision scenarios reveals a 12.1% (95% CI −0.3%–23.0%; ns) reduction in collisions of all injury levels between forward-moving cars and street-crossing pedestrians, an 9.7% (95% CI −2.2%–20.2%; ns) reduction in collisions between right-turning cars and street-crossing pedestrians, and a 21.8% (95% CI 4.8%–35.9%) reduction in collisions between forward-moving cars and pedestrians walking in the same or opposite direction. The results demonstrate that AEB systems are effective in reducing car-pedestrian collisions; however, performance remains low compared with the effectiveness of AEB in reducing rear-end collisions. This indicates that considerable room remains for technological improvement.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29582322
Primary Topic
Traffic and Road Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance of AEB systems in preventing car-pedestrian collisions

Figshare
Traffic and Road Safety
article

Performance of AEB systems in preventing car-pedestrian collisions

article en

Abstract

This study quantifies the performance of autonomous emergency braking (AEB) systems in preventing car-pedestrian collisions in Japan. The study uses data on Japanese traffic accidents compiled by Japan’s National Police Agency, restricting the analysis to collisions for which we could determine whether the primary party’s car was equipped with an AEB system. Poisson mixed-effects regression analyses are conducted using data for 2022 and 2023 to quantify the collision avoidance performance of cars that were first registered in 2021 and equipped with AEB systems compared with cars without AEB systems that were first registered in 2015 or 2016. Our analysis of collisions of all injury levels reveals that AEB-equipped cars that were first registered in 2021 had 12.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.2%–18.0%) fewer accidents than non-AEB-equipped cars that were first registered in 2015 or 2016. The reduction for fatal and serious injury collisions alone was higher, at 15.6% (95% CI 2.2%–27.2%). A day/night analysis demonstrates a 7.6% (95% CI −0.9%–15.3%; ns) reduction in daytime collisions and a 19.0% (95% CI 9.9%–27.1%) reduction in nighttime collisions. Analysis of three car-pedestrian collision scenarios reveals a 12.1% (95% CI −0.3%–23.0%; ns) reduction in collisions of all injury levels between forward-moving cars and street-crossing pedestrians, an 9.7% (95% CI −2.2%–20.2%; ns) reduction in collisions between right-turning cars and street-crossing pedestrians, and a 21.8% (95% CI 4.8%–35.9%) reduction in collisions between forward-moving cars and pedestrians walking in the same or opposite direction. The results demonstrate that AEB systems are effective in reducing car-pedestrian collisions; however, performance remains low compared with the effectiveness of AEB in reducing rear-end collisions. This indicates that considerable room remains for technological improvement.

Figshare
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Traffic and Road Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.