A green divide? Climate policy support and its rural geography in Europe

Opposition to the green transition is often attributed to the direct costs of climate policies, with particularly vulnerable individuals perceived as more resistant. While recent studies suggest rural Europeans may be more adversely affected by these policies, their attitudes have largely been overlooked. This article investigates whether, and in which context, rural Europeans are indeed less supportive of climate policies. It proposes that attitudes vary depending on the specific policy and its spatial effects. Drawing on survey data from nine European countries and an additional analysis in France, the study examines the urban–rural divide across a wide range of climate policies. Findings indicate significant differences in support for policies placing higher <i>concentrated</i> or <i>cumulative</i> costs on rural residents as well as those potentially generating other grievances, rooted in perceived cultural conflicts or symbolic lifestyle concerns. Climate politics must therefore account for the diverse geographic and contextual factors shaping policy attitudes.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29436819.v1
Primary Topic
Rural development and sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A green divide? Climate policy support and its rural geography in Europe

Figshare
Rural development and sustainability
article

A green divide? Climate policy support and its rural geography in Europe

article en

Abstract

Opposition to the green transition is often attributed to the direct costs of climate policies, with particularly vulnerable individuals perceived as more resistant. While recent studies suggest rural Europeans may be more adversely affected by these policies, their attitudes have largely been overlooked. This article investigates whether, and in which context, rural Europeans are indeed less supportive of climate policies. It proposes that attitudes vary depending on the specific policy and its spatial effects. Drawing on survey data from nine European countries and an additional analysis in France, the study examines the urban–rural divide across a wide range of climate policies. Findings indicate significant differences in support for policies placing higher <i>concentrated</i> or <i>cumulative</i> costs on rural residents as well as those potentially generating other grievances, rooted in perceived cultural conflicts or symbolic lifestyle concerns. Climate politics must therefore account for the diverse geographic and contextual factors shaping policy attitudes.

Figshare
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Rural development and sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A green divide? Climate policy support and its rural geography in Europe · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS