Bayesian meta-analysis for rare outcomes

Binary meta-analysis studies with rare outcomes frequently include zero or a small number of observations in study groups, creating a sparsity issue with the data. The corrections applied to eliminate the impact of the zero cell counts introduce a bias to the meta-analysis results and potentially distort the inferences about the treatment effect and heterogeneity among the studies. The boundaries of interval estimates become highly biased due to the sparsity of the data. This study proposes two Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis models based on the beta-binomial model with an arc-sine-square-root transformation. The performance of the models in estimating the treatment effect and the in-between study variance is assessed with an extensive Monte Carlo simulation study, and a frequently referred meta-analysis dataset is revisited. The models provide accurate estimates of treatment effect and heterogeneity parameters without a continuity correction. They provide well-calibrated, narrow interval estimates with sufficient coverage of true treatment effect and in-between study variance. They are robust against zero cell counts, very low event probabilities, and unbalanced, skewed data distributions. Recommendations are given for the practical use of the proposed models, and the required model scripts are provided to implement the models using R software.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29269225
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bayesian meta-analysis for rare outcomes

Figshare
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
article

Bayesian meta-analysis for rare outcomes

article en

Abstract

Binary meta-analysis studies with rare outcomes frequently include zero or a small number of observations in study groups, creating a sparsity issue with the data. The corrections applied to eliminate the impact of the zero cell counts introduce a bias to the meta-analysis results and potentially distort the inferences about the treatment effect and heterogeneity among the studies. The boundaries of interval estimates become highly biased due to the sparsity of the data. This study proposes two Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis models based on the beta-binomial model with an arc-sine-square-root transformation. The performance of the models in estimating the treatment effect and the in-between study variance is assessed with an extensive Monte Carlo simulation study, and a frequently referred meta-analysis dataset is revisited. The models provide accurate estimates of treatment effect and heterogeneity parameters without a continuity correction. They provide well-calibrated, narrow interval estimates with sufficient coverage of true treatment effect and in-between study variance. They are robust against zero cell counts, very low event probabilities, and unbalanced, skewed data distributions. Recommendations are given for the practical use of the proposed models, and the required model scripts are provided to implement the models using R software.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.