Efficacy and safety of omitting 5-fluorouracil bolus in combination chemotherapy regimens for gastrointestinal cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of omitting the 5-FU bolus in chemotherapy regimens for gastrointestinal cancers on treatment efficacy and toxicity. We searched major databases and congress proceedings until 25 October 2024 to identify studies comparing 5-FU bolus and non-5-FU bolus regimens in patients with gastrointestinal cancers. The studies included those reporting on progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events in metastatic gastrointestinal cancer patients. The analysis included 7 studies with 12,698 patients. No significant differences in PFS (HR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.83–1.07) or OS (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.89–1.03) were found between the 5-FU bolus and non-bolus groups. However, significantly higher rates of grade 3–4 neutropenia (OR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.37–0.57) and any grade thrombocytopenia (OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.35–0.80) were observed in the 5-FU bolus group. No significant differences were found for other toxicities like febrile neutropenia, diarrhea, or nausea. This meta-analysis demonstrates that the omission of 5-FU bolus from the commonly used 5-FU-based chemotherapy regimens in gastrointestinal cancers, with the use of only 5-FU infusion, may reduce the risk of hematologic toxicities such as neutropenia and thrombocytopenia without affecting survival outcomes in metastatic gastrointestinal cancers. www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero identifier is CRD42024602968.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29446571
Primary Topic
Ego Development and Educational Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy and safety of omitting 5-fluorouracil bolus in combination chemotherapy regimens for gastrointestinal cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Figshare
Ego Development and Educational Practices
article

Efficacy and safety of omitting 5-fluorouracil bolus in combination chemotherapy regimens for gastrointestinal cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

article en

Abstract

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of omitting the 5-FU bolus in chemotherapy regimens for gastrointestinal cancers on treatment efficacy and toxicity. We searched major databases and congress proceedings until 25 October 2024 to identify studies comparing 5-FU bolus and non-5-FU bolus regimens in patients with gastrointestinal cancers. The studies included those reporting on progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events in metastatic gastrointestinal cancer patients. The analysis included 7 studies with 12,698 patients. No significant differences in PFS (HR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.83–1.07) or OS (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.89–1.03) were found between the 5-FU bolus and non-bolus groups. However, significantly higher rates of grade 3–4 neutropenia (OR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.37–0.57) and any grade thrombocytopenia (OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.35–0.80) were observed in the 5-FU bolus group. No significant differences were found for other toxicities like febrile neutropenia, diarrhea, or nausea. This meta-analysis demonstrates that the omission of 5-FU bolus from the commonly used 5-FU-based chemotherapy regimens in gastrointestinal cancers, with the use of only 5-FU infusion, may reduce the risk of hematologic toxicities such as neutropenia and thrombocytopenia without affecting survival outcomes in metastatic gastrointestinal cancers. www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero identifier is CRD42024602968.

Figshare
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Ego Development and Educational Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.