A Radical Re-evaluation of Landscape Stewardship and Conservation Planning Priorities

Landscape conservation is at an inflection point. Massive acreages of land held by baby boomers will change hands in the next several decades. To meet climate mitigation goals, landscape conservation needs an unfathomable amount of funding and manpower to conserve as much ‘ecologically valuable’ land as possible. At this crucial time, the theories that support and direct landscape conservation are as important as the work itself. The purpose of this paper is to examine several of the theories that inform conservation planning through a critical lens. There are several problematic topics of discussion that are directly related to this issue worthy of examination such as: environmental justice, the housing crisis, the land back movement, the myth of the pristine, and allocation of funds towards invasive plant removal programs. This paper will make the argument for a re-evaluation of conservation planning theory and priorities in New England based on recent research and emerging knowledge.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
University of Massachusetts (UMass) Amherst
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7275/fabos.2743
Primary Topic
Urban Planning and Landscape Design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Radical Re-evaluation of Landscape Stewardship and Conservation Planning Priorities

University of Massachusetts (UMass) Amherst
Urban Planning and Landscape Design
article

A Radical Re-evaluation of Landscape Stewardship and Conservation Planning Priorities

article en

Abstract

Landscape conservation is at an inflection point. Massive acreages of land held by baby boomers will change hands in the next several decades. To meet climate mitigation goals, landscape conservation needs an unfathomable amount of funding and manpower to conserve as much ‘ecologically valuable’ land as possible. At this crucial time, the theories that support and direct landscape conservation are as important as the work itself. The purpose of this paper is to examine several of the theories that inform conservation planning through a critical lens. There are several problematic topics of discussion that are directly related to this issue worthy of examination such as: environmental justice, the housing crisis, the land back movement, the myth of the pristine, and allocation of funds towards invasive plant removal programs. This paper will make the argument for a re-evaluation of conservation planning theory and priorities in New England based on recent research and emerging knowledge.

University of Massachusetts (UMass) Amherst
Landscape Institute (GB)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Urban Planning and Landscape Design
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.