Functional communication disorders: a systematic review of interventions to improve outcomes in adults

To determine what evidence there is for the effectiveness/efficacy of interventions to improve outcomes in adults with Functional Communication Disorders (FCDs). Seven electronic databases were searched <i>via</i> two platforms. The review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Population comprised adults with any specific communication diagnosis with a functional aetiology. We included studies of any type of behavioural intervention which targeted FCD, with any comparator. All outcomes related to communication were included. There were no restrictions on year or language of publication. Seven studies were included in the review. Studies used different interventions and outcome measures thus meta-analysis was not performed. Six studies described interventions for functional voice disorders and one for functional stuttering. Interventions tended to include elements of patient education, standard voice or speech therapy, and a psychological support component. Study quality was generally poor. There is a lack of high-quality research to guide clinicians on evidence-based interventions for the full range of FCDs. There were some common themes within the interventions offered, but the overall poor quality of studies makes it difficult to draw conclusions on the effectiveness and efficacy of these interventions. There is a lack of high-quality intervention studies on the full range of Functional Communication Disorder (FCD) presentations.The strongest evidence base is for Functional Voice Disorders.Generalisable evidence regarding the effectiveness and efficacy of Speech and Language Therapy interventions for FCDs is limited.Literature recommends that intervention for FCDs should include patient education, techniques used in standard speech or voice therapy, and psychological support. There is a lack of high-quality intervention studies on the full range of Functional Communication Disorder (FCD) presentations. The strongest evidence base is for Functional Voice Disorders. Generalisable evidence regarding the effectiveness and efficacy of Speech and Language Therapy interventions for FCDs is limited. Literature recommends that intervention for FCDs should include patient education, techniques used in standard speech or voice therapy, and psychological support.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28193522.v1
Primary Topic
Voice and Speech Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Functional communication disorders: a systematic review of interventions to improve outcomes in adults

Figshare
Voice and Speech Disorders
article

Functional communication disorders: a systematic review of interventions to improve outcomes in adults

article en

Abstract

To determine what evidence there is for the effectiveness/efficacy of interventions to improve outcomes in adults with Functional Communication Disorders (FCDs). Seven electronic databases were searched <i>via</i> two platforms. The review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Population comprised adults with any specific communication diagnosis with a functional aetiology. We included studies of any type of behavioural intervention which targeted FCD, with any comparator. All outcomes related to communication were included. There were no restrictions on year or language of publication. Seven studies were included in the review. Studies used different interventions and outcome measures thus meta-analysis was not performed. Six studies described interventions for functional voice disorders and one for functional stuttering. Interventions tended to include elements of patient education, standard voice or speech therapy, and a psychological support component. Study quality was generally poor. There is a lack of high-quality research to guide clinicians on evidence-based interventions for the full range of FCDs. There were some common themes within the interventions offered, but the overall poor quality of studies makes it difficult to draw conclusions on the effectiveness and efficacy of these interventions. There is a lack of high-quality intervention studies on the full range of Functional Communication Disorder (FCD) presentations.The strongest evidence base is for Functional Voice Disorders.Generalisable evidence regarding the effectiveness and efficacy of Speech and Language Therapy interventions for FCDs is limited.Literature recommends that intervention for FCDs should include patient education, techniques used in standard speech or voice therapy, and psychological support. There is a lack of high-quality intervention studies on the full range of Functional Communication Disorder (FCD) presentations. The strongest evidence base is for Functional Voice Disorders. Generalisable evidence regarding the effectiveness and efficacy of Speech and Language Therapy interventions for FCDs is limited. Literature recommends that intervention for FCDs should include patient education, techniques used in standard speech or voice therapy, and psychological support.

Figshare
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Voice and Speech Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Functional communication disorders: a systematic review of interventions to improve outcomes in adults · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS