Evaluation of different methods for the separation of acetonitrile and water. Liquid-liquid and solid-liquid extraction

To separate azeotropic mixtures efficiently, an entrainer is often required. In addition to extractive or azeotropic distillation, extraction with liquid or solid entraining agents can also be used. The most important task is to select an entrainer with high separation performance, considering the downstream step, i.e. the regeneration of the entrainer. This study aims to separate acetonitrile-water mixtures using liquid-liquid extraction with hydrophilic and hydrophobic DESs and solid-liquid extraction with various solid compounds. Both experimental and thermodynamic modeling approaches were used. Of the hydrophilic DES tested, only three DESs caused phase separation. Sodium chloride showed the best separation performance among the solid entrainers tested. Hydrophobic DESs, especially the one with decanoic acid, proved to be the most suitable liquid entrainers. The impact of feed composition, stage number, and DES reusability on separation performance was investigated. Considering the solvent consumption, multistage extraction is the best performing method for separating acetonitrile and water. Hydrophobic DESs were successfully regenerated by freezing.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29907972.v1
Primary Topic
Process Optimization and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of different methods for the separation of acetonitrile and water. Liquid-liquid and solid-liquid extraction

Figshare
Process Optimization and Integration
article

Evaluation of different methods for the separation of acetonitrile and water. Liquid-liquid and solid-liquid extraction

article en

Abstract

To separate azeotropic mixtures efficiently, an entrainer is often required. In addition to extractive or azeotropic distillation, extraction with liquid or solid entraining agents can also be used. The most important task is to select an entrainer with high separation performance, considering the downstream step, i.e. the regeneration of the entrainer. This study aims to separate acetonitrile-water mixtures using liquid-liquid extraction with hydrophilic and hydrophobic DESs and solid-liquid extraction with various solid compounds. Both experimental and thermodynamic modeling approaches were used. Of the hydrophilic DES tested, only three DESs caused phase separation. Sodium chloride showed the best separation performance among the solid entrainers tested. Hydrophobic DESs, especially the one with decanoic acid, proved to be the most suitable liquid entrainers. The impact of feed composition, stage number, and DES reusability on separation performance was investigated. Considering the solvent consumption, multistage extraction is the best performing method for separating acetonitrile and water. Hydrophobic DESs were successfully regenerated by freezing.

Figshare
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Process Optimization and Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.