Resolution Matrix Semantics for Deontic Logic

This paper introduces Resolution Matrix Semantics (RMS) [Kuznetsov, 2025] as a novel framework for formalizing deontic logic, inspired by Y. Ivlev’s quasi-matrix approach [Ivlev, 1997]. Unlike traditional Kripkean semantics, RMS employs a truth-value-based approach with normative values—mandatory (m), indifferent (i), and forbidden (b)—to evaluate acts, and true (t) or false (f) for formulas, ensuring a clear distinction between normative and propositional domains. This truth value semantics is augmented with “undetermined” truth values (e.g. m/i, “either m, or i”), and RMS uses an interpretation and sub-interpretation mechanism to resolve these, enabling precise normative evaluations. We develop SDLm, a deontic system that mirrors Standard Deontic Logic (SDL) in its axiomatic structure but avoids well-known paradoxes, such as the Chisholm and Gentle Murderer Paradoxes. We prove SDLm’s soundness and completeness and provide tableau rules for automated theorem verification. By prioritizing normative status over existential considerations, SDLm offers a robust, paradox-free framework for reasoning about obligations, permissions, and prohibitions, with potential applications in ethics, law, and artificial intelligence.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29207516.v1
Primary Topic
Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resolution Matrix Semantics for Deontic Logic

Figshare
Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
article

Resolution Matrix Semantics for Deontic Logic

article en

Abstract

This paper introduces Resolution Matrix Semantics (RMS) [Kuznetsov, 2025] as a novel framework for formalizing deontic logic, inspired by Y. Ivlev’s quasi-matrix approach [Ivlev, 1997]. Unlike traditional Kripkean semantics, RMS employs a truth-value-based approach with normative values—mandatory (m), indifferent (i), and forbidden (b)—to evaluate acts, and true (t) or false (f) for formulas, ensuring a clear distinction between normative and propositional domains. This truth value semantics is augmented with “undetermined” truth values (e.g. m/i, “either m, or i”), and RMS uses an interpretation and sub-interpretation mechanism to resolve these, enabling precise normative evaluations. We develop SDLm, a deontic system that mirrors Standard Deontic Logic (SDL) in its axiomatic structure but avoids well-known paradoxes, such as the Chisholm and Gentle Murderer Paradoxes. We prove SDLm’s soundness and completeness and provide tableau rules for automated theorem verification. By prioritizing normative status over existential considerations, SDLm offers a robust, paradox-free framework for reasoning about obligations, permissions, and prohibitions, with potential applications in ethics, law, and artificial intelligence.

Figshare
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Resolution Matrix Semantics for Deontic Logic · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS