Occupational performance of cochlear implant users: a comparative study with other hearing-impaired and normal-hearing individuals

This cross-sectional study aimed to compare occupational performance of cochlear implant (CI) users to that of adults with hearing impairment without CI and those with normal hearing (NH). We used the Amsterdam Checklist for Hearing and Work to assess job characteristics, hearing activities, need for recovery and other outcomes. We included 204 adults: 98 CI users (mean age 51), 52 participants with hearing impairment, without CI (HI group, mean age 49) and 54 participants with NH (NH group, mean age 46). Job characteristics were similar between the groups, but the CI and HI groups were significantly more likely to report (effortful) communication in noise compared to the NH group. Need for recovery was significantly higher in the HI than in the NH group, but the CI and NH groups showed no significant difference. The CI group needed less guidance in managing their hearing loss in the workplace than the HI group did. The relatively favourable outcomes for CI users in need for recovery and reduced need for guidance at work may be due to the extensive training and counselling they received as part of their rehabilitation program.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29040467
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Occupational performance of cochlear implant users: a comparative study with other hearing-impaired and normal-hearing individuals

Figshare
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

Occupational performance of cochlear implant users: a comparative study with other hearing-impaired and normal-hearing individuals

article en

Abstract

This cross-sectional study aimed to compare occupational performance of cochlear implant (CI) users to that of adults with hearing impairment without CI and those with normal hearing (NH). We used the Amsterdam Checklist for Hearing and Work to assess job characteristics, hearing activities, need for recovery and other outcomes. We included 204 adults: 98 CI users (mean age 51), 52 participants with hearing impairment, without CI (HI group, mean age 49) and 54 participants with NH (NH group, mean age 46). Job characteristics were similar between the groups, but the CI and HI groups were significantly more likely to report (effortful) communication in noise compared to the NH group. Need for recovery was significantly higher in the HI than in the NH group, but the CI and NH groups showed no significant difference. The CI group needed less guidance in managing their hearing loss in the workplace than the HI group did. The relatively favourable outcomes for CI users in need for recovery and reduced need for guidance at work may be due to the extensive training and counselling they received as part of their rehabilitation program.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Occupational performance of cochlear implant users: a comparative study with other hearing-impaired and normal-hearing individuals · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS