Is the “No-Damage” Design Economically Sustainable in High Seismicity Zones? A Preliminary Response for Moment-Resisting RC Framed Structures

This study investigates the feasibility of a stiffness-based seismic design aimed at minimizing damage and downtime after earthquakes. Three conceptual RC buildings were analyzed: one designed according to conventional code-compliant practices and two using the proposed approach. Monotonic and cyclic nonlinear static analyses evaluated structural performance, while an economic assessment considered construction costs and expected losses due to seismic events. Results show that stiffness-based designs significantly reduce residual displacements and Expected Annual Loss compared to traditional designs, despite higher initial construction costs. The design adhering to capacity rules demonstrated superior performance, making it more cost-effective when total expenditures are considered.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29679537.v1
Primary Topic
Seismic Performance and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is the “No-Damage” Design Economically Sustainable in High Seismicity Zones? A Preliminary Response for Moment-Resisting RC Framed Structures

Figshare
Seismic Performance and Analysis
article

Is the “No-Damage” Design Economically Sustainable in High Seismicity Zones? A Preliminary Response for Moment-Resisting RC Framed Structures

article en

Abstract

This study investigates the feasibility of a stiffness-based seismic design aimed at minimizing damage and downtime after earthquakes. Three conceptual RC buildings were analyzed: one designed according to conventional code-compliant practices and two using the proposed approach. Monotonic and cyclic nonlinear static analyses evaluated structural performance, while an economic assessment considered construction costs and expected losses due to seismic events. Results show that stiffness-based designs significantly reduce residual displacements and Expected Annual Loss compared to traditional designs, despite higher initial construction costs. The design adhering to capacity rules demonstrated superior performance, making it more cost-effective when total expenditures are considered.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Seismic Performance and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.