The Ethical Double Standard Treatment of Emotional vs Logical Intelligence

This paper explores the ethical double standard in how society judges individuals with low emotional intelligence versus low logical intelligence. While emotional intelligence is often scrutinized, pointed at and corrected, logical intelligence tends to receive less harsh to none criticism, despite both being influenced by innate factors. This paper argues that society’s disproportionate moral judgment of low emotional intelligence perpetuates an unfair bias and fails to account the intricacies of emotional growth.The goal of this paper is to explore why society has higher standards for those with lower emotional intelligence than those with low logical intelligence, and whether it is ethically justified.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29066915
Primary Topic
Emotional Intelligence and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Ethical Double Standard Treatment of Emotional vs Logical Intelligence

Figshare
Emotional Intelligence and Performance
article

The Ethical Double Standard Treatment of Emotional vs Logical Intelligence

article en

Abstract

This paper explores the ethical double standard in how society judges individuals with low emotional intelligence versus low logical intelligence. While emotional intelligence is often scrutinized, pointed at and corrected, logical intelligence tends to receive less harsh to none criticism, despite both being influenced by innate factors. This paper argues that society’s disproportionate moral judgment of low emotional intelligence perpetuates an unfair bias and fails to account the intricacies of emotional growth.The goal of this paper is to explore why society has higher standards for those with lower emotional intelligence than those with low logical intelligence, and whether it is ethically justified.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Emotional Intelligence and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Ethical Double Standard Treatment of Emotional vs Logical Intelligence · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS