Real-world healthcare utilization and costs of peripheral nerve stimulation with a micro-IPG system

To characterize real-world healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs in adults with chronic pain of peripheral nerve origin treated with peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) using the micro-implantable pulse generator (IPG). This retrospective observational study (9/1/19–1/31/23) linked patients from the Nalu medical database to the OM1 Real-World Data Cloud (RWDC). Eligible patients received the micro-IPG implant for PNS, were identifiable in both databases, and had ≥ 12 months of RWDC pre/post-implantation claims data. Primary outcomes were all-cause HRCU and medical costs (12 months pre- and post-implantation); secondary outcomes were all-cause pharmacy costs, including opioids, over the same time. Patients (<i>N</i> = 122) had a higher mean (standard deviation; SD) number of outpatient visits pre-implantation (5.7 [5.4]) than post-implantation (4.9 [5.7]). Mean (SD) total medical costs were 50% lower, from $27,493 ($44,756) to $13,717 ($23,278). Median (first-third quartile [Q1-Q3]) medical costs were 57% lower, from $11,809 ($4,075–$31,788) to $5,094 ($1,815-$13,820). Mean (SD) pharmacy costs (<i>n</i> = 77) were higher post-implantation ($22,470 [$77,203]) than pre-implantation ($20,092 [$64,132]), while median (Q1-Q3) costs were lower (from $2,708 [$222 -11,882] to $2,122 [$50–9,370]). Post-implantation, the proportion of patients using opioids was 31.4% lower. Patients with PNS using the micro-IPG had reduced HCRU, costs, and opioid use. <b>Title</b>Healthcare Use and Costs with a Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Device for Chronic Pain <b>Summary:</b> This study reviewed the medical records of 122 adults who received peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS), a treatment for chronic pain, to understand how PNS affects patient healthcare use and costs. Healthcare use and costs in the year before PNS were compared with the year after. The results showed that PNS helped reduce the number of doctor’s visits and medical expenses. After starting PNS therapy, the average number of outpatient doctor’s visits was lowered from 5.7 to 4.9 per year, and total medical costs were cut in half, from $27,493 to $13,717. In addition, the number of patients using opioids went down by 31.4%.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28142283.v1
Primary Topic
Pain Management and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-world healthcare utilization and costs of peripheral nerve stimulation with a micro-IPG system

Figshare
Pain Management and Treatment
article

Real-world healthcare utilization and costs of peripheral nerve stimulation with a micro-IPG system

article en

Abstract

To characterize real-world healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs in adults with chronic pain of peripheral nerve origin treated with peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) using the micro-implantable pulse generator (IPG). This retrospective observational study (9/1/19–1/31/23) linked patients from the Nalu medical database to the OM1 Real-World Data Cloud (RWDC). Eligible patients received the micro-IPG implant for PNS, were identifiable in both databases, and had ≥ 12 months of RWDC pre/post-implantation claims data. Primary outcomes were all-cause HRCU and medical costs (12 months pre- and post-implantation); secondary outcomes were all-cause pharmacy costs, including opioids, over the same time. Patients (<i>N</i> = 122) had a higher mean (standard deviation; SD) number of outpatient visits pre-implantation (5.7 [5.4]) than post-implantation (4.9 [5.7]). Mean (SD) total medical costs were 50% lower, from $27,493 ($44,756) to $13,717 ($23,278). Median (first-third quartile [Q1-Q3]) medical costs were 57% lower, from $11,809 ($4,075–$31,788) to $5,094 ($1,815-$13,820). Mean (SD) pharmacy costs (<i>n</i> = 77) were higher post-implantation ($22,470 [$77,203]) than pre-implantation ($20,092 [$64,132]), while median (Q1-Q3) costs were lower (from $2,708 [$222 -11,882] to $2,122 [$50–9,370]). Post-implantation, the proportion of patients using opioids was 31.4% lower. Patients with PNS using the micro-IPG had reduced HCRU, costs, and opioid use. <b>Title</b>Healthcare Use and Costs with a Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Device for Chronic Pain <b>Summary:</b> This study reviewed the medical records of 122 adults who received peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS), a treatment for chronic pain, to understand how PNS affects patient healthcare use and costs. Healthcare use and costs in the year before PNS were compared with the year after. The results showed that PNS helped reduce the number of doctor’s visits and medical expenses. After starting PNS therapy, the average number of outpatient doctor’s visits was lowered from 5.7 to 4.9 per year, and total medical costs were cut in half, from $27,493 to $13,717. In addition, the number of patients using opioids went down by 31.4%.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Pain Management and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.