Modeling the involution of microwave liver ablation zones

The post-ablation involution of microwave liver ablation zones (AZs) remains poorly understood. This study develops mathematical models to characterize AZ involution and identifies key predictors influencing its dynamics. Fifty-four patients (mean age 61 ± 10 years (standard deviation), 33 men) underwent microwave liver ablation (MWA) of 76 liver tumors and follow-up contrast enhanced CT (CECT) imaging in this retrospective single-center cohort study. AZs were segmented on intraprocedural post-ablation portal-venous phase CECT and all available subsequent postprocedural follow-up scans, or until local tumor progression (LTP). Volumetric AZ involution was modeled using non-linear regression methods and correlated with initial tumor and ablation parameters. In total, 366 AZ segmentations were performed over median 304 days CECT-follow-up (range 21–741). Involution was best modeled by mono-exponential decay (SSE = 4.64, RMSE = 0.11). AZs shrank to one-third of baseline volume within a year, with a half-life of 158 days. At 6 weeks, relative volume was 0.81 of baseline (95% prediction interval 0.59–1.04, 95% confidence interval 0.80–0.83). Variables with a significant effect on involution included initial tumor diameter (<i>p</i> = 0.03), initial AZ volume (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), and tumor:AZ volume ratio (<i>p</i> = 0.04). Microwave ablation zones rapidly involute and stabilize at approximately one-third of their baseline volume within a year. The involution process is best modeled by mono-exponential decay and influenced by the type of tissue ablated. These findings highlight the potential need for predictive models to adjust for involution for follow-up imaging-based margin assessment to optimize accuracy and ablation outcomes.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29580628
Primary Topic
Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling the involution of microwave liver ablation zones

Figshare
Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
article

Modeling the involution of microwave liver ablation zones

article en

Abstract

The post-ablation involution of microwave liver ablation zones (AZs) remains poorly understood. This study develops mathematical models to characterize AZ involution and identifies key predictors influencing its dynamics. Fifty-four patients (mean age 61 ± 10 years (standard deviation), 33 men) underwent microwave liver ablation (MWA) of 76 liver tumors and follow-up contrast enhanced CT (CECT) imaging in this retrospective single-center cohort study. AZs were segmented on intraprocedural post-ablation portal-venous phase CECT and all available subsequent postprocedural follow-up scans, or until local tumor progression (LTP). Volumetric AZ involution was modeled using non-linear regression methods and correlated with initial tumor and ablation parameters. In total, 366 AZ segmentations were performed over median 304 days CECT-follow-up (range 21–741). Involution was best modeled by mono-exponential decay (SSE = 4.64, RMSE = 0.11). AZs shrank to one-third of baseline volume within a year, with a half-life of 158 days. At 6 weeks, relative volume was 0.81 of baseline (95% prediction interval 0.59–1.04, 95% confidence interval 0.80–0.83). Variables with a significant effect on involution included initial tumor diameter (<i>p</i> = 0.03), initial AZ volume (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), and tumor:AZ volume ratio (<i>p</i> = 0.04). Microwave ablation zones rapidly involute and stabilize at approximately one-third of their baseline volume within a year. The involution process is best modeled by mono-exponential decay and influenced by the type of tissue ablated. These findings highlight the potential need for predictive models to adjust for involution for follow-up imaging-based margin assessment to optimize accuracy and ablation outcomes.

Figshare
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.