Do course syllabi reflect observed teaching practices in undergraduate geoscience courses?

Syllabi are an important communication tool that can convey information about a course, including pedagogical strategies instructors intend to use. The material in course syllabi is thought to reflect such factors as instructors’ professional development and prior teaching experiences, both of which influence beliefs about teaching. These factors also influence how in-class instruction occurs. However, the extent to which syllabi predict instruction has not been explored in detail, despite the fact that students rely on syllabi to gain logistical information as well as first impressions about an instructor and the course. Given this, we designed a study to examine alignment between syllabi and in-class instruction, and explore the possibility of using syllabi as an alternative to resource heavy classroom observations. We created a syllabus rubric and scored 155 course syllabi from previously observed geoscience courses. Scored syllabi were collected as part of classroom observations we completed using the Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP) from 2012 to 2019. After finding a low correlation between syllabi rubric scores and RTOP observation scores, regression modeling with k-fold cross validation was used to assess how accurately RTOP scores could be predicted from course syllabi and determine if a subset of specific items in our syllabus rubric could be used to better predict teaching practices. Our final model had low predictive ability (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.296), but we found that four out of 29 syllabi items related to active learning, percentage of course grade from exams, metacognitive activities, and high-level learning outcomes were most predictive of teaching practices. This work suggests that syllabi do not strongly predict the teaching practices used in geosciences classrooms. We recommend that faculty use syllabi as an opportunity to reflect on and document their teaching practices so that syllabi are more descriptive of the instruction that students can expect in their courses.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29039977
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do course syllabi reflect observed teaching practices in undergraduate geoscience courses?

Figshare
Science Education and Pedagogy
article

Do course syllabi reflect observed teaching practices in undergraduate geoscience courses?

article en

Abstract

Syllabi are an important communication tool that can convey information about a course, including pedagogical strategies instructors intend to use. The material in course syllabi is thought to reflect such factors as instructors’ professional development and prior teaching experiences, both of which influence beliefs about teaching. These factors also influence how in-class instruction occurs. However, the extent to which syllabi predict instruction has not been explored in detail, despite the fact that students rely on syllabi to gain logistical information as well as first impressions about an instructor and the course. Given this, we designed a study to examine alignment between syllabi and in-class instruction, and explore the possibility of using syllabi as an alternative to resource heavy classroom observations. We created a syllabus rubric and scored 155 course syllabi from previously observed geoscience courses. Scored syllabi were collected as part of classroom observations we completed using the Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP) from 2012 to 2019. After finding a low correlation between syllabi rubric scores and RTOP observation scores, regression modeling with k-fold cross validation was used to assess how accurately RTOP scores could be predicted from course syllabi and determine if a subset of specific items in our syllabus rubric could be used to better predict teaching practices. Our final model had low predictive ability (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.296), but we found that four out of 29 syllabi items related to active learning, percentage of course grade from exams, metacognitive activities, and high-level learning outcomes were most predictive of teaching practices. This work suggests that syllabi do not strongly predict the teaching practices used in geosciences classrooms. We recommend that faculty use syllabi as an opportunity to reflect on and document their teaching practices so that syllabi are more descriptive of the instruction that students can expect in their courses.

Figshare
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Science Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Do course syllabi reflect observed teaching practices in undergraduate geoscience courses? · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS