Taxonomy of epistemic violence risks in ai systems

This paper proposes a taxonomy of the risks of epistemic violence in artificial intelligence (AI) systems and addresses how these systems can perpetuate disparities in knowledge access. Using critical social epistemology and algorithmic ethics as a foundation, six main categories were identified: epistemic invisibilization, conceptual appropriation, algorithmic silencing, hermeneutic exclusion, asymmetry of representation in data, and naturalization of historical biases. This study sheds light on how these phenomena can perpetuate the marginalization of social groups, distort minority knowledge, and automate discrimination. The proposed taxonomy serves as an analytical tool to guide ethical impact assessments and the development of guidelines for the responsible creation of AI tools. The study emphasizes the importance of critical approaches to ensure technology contributes to an inclusive, equitable digital environment.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29314232.v2
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Taxonomy of epistemic violence risks in ai systems

Figshare
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Taxonomy of epistemic violence risks in ai systems

article en

Abstract

This paper proposes a taxonomy of the risks of epistemic violence in artificial intelligence (AI) systems and addresses how these systems can perpetuate disparities in knowledge access. Using critical social epistemology and algorithmic ethics as a foundation, six main categories were identified: epistemic invisibilization, conceptual appropriation, algorithmic silencing, hermeneutic exclusion, asymmetry of representation in data, and naturalization of historical biases. This study sheds light on how these phenomena can perpetuate the marginalization of social groups, distort minority knowledge, and automate discrimination. The proposed taxonomy serves as an analytical tool to guide ethical impact assessments and the development of guidelines for the responsible creation of AI tools. The study emphasizes the importance of critical approaches to ensure technology contributes to an inclusive, equitable digital environment.

Figshare
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.