Flood risk modelling by the synergistic approach of machine learning and best-worst method in Indus Kohistan, Western Himalaya

Flood risk mapping is essential for effective mitigation and planning. In this study, we propose a novel synergistic approach for flood risk mapping in Indus Kohistan, Pakistan, by integrating machine learning (ML) models and the best-worst method (BWM). Flood hazard assessment was carried out using random forest (RF) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), while flood vulnerability was evaluated through BWM. The supporting data comprised 415 flood points, 13 flood hazard factors, and 6 flood vulnerability indicators. The RF model outperformed XGBoost, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.99, compared to 0.98 for XGBoost. Ultimately, the RF model was utilized to generate the flood hazard map. Distance to streams and elevation are key drivers of flood hazard, with relative importance values of 0.43 and 0.19, respectively. Meanwhile, population density and household density have the highest impact on flood vulnerability, contributing 40.2% and 24.7%, respectively. The flood risk map reveals that 1.4%, 4.6%, 9%, 18.4%, and 65.9% of the total land are categorized as very high-risk, high-risk, medium-risk, low-risk, and very low-risk, respectively. The proposed methodology and flood risk map results can be valuable for identifying priority measures for flood risk reduction and management.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28485298.v1
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Flood risk modelling by the synergistic approach of machine learning and best-worst method in Indus Kohistan, Western Himalaya

Figshare
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
article

Flood risk modelling by the synergistic approach of machine learning and best-worst method in Indus Kohistan, Western Himalaya

article en

Abstract

Flood risk mapping is essential for effective mitigation and planning. In this study, we propose a novel synergistic approach for flood risk mapping in Indus Kohistan, Pakistan, by integrating machine learning (ML) models and the best-worst method (BWM). Flood hazard assessment was carried out using random forest (RF) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), while flood vulnerability was evaluated through BWM. The supporting data comprised 415 flood points, 13 flood hazard factors, and 6 flood vulnerability indicators. The RF model outperformed XGBoost, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.99, compared to 0.98 for XGBoost. Ultimately, the RF model was utilized to generate the flood hazard map. Distance to streams and elevation are key drivers of flood hazard, with relative importance values of 0.43 and 0.19, respectively. Meanwhile, population density and household density have the highest impact on flood vulnerability, contributing 40.2% and 24.7%, respectively. The flood risk map reveals that 1.4%, 4.6%, 9%, 18.4%, and 65.9% of the total land are categorized as very high-risk, high-risk, medium-risk, low-risk, and very low-risk, respectively. The proposed methodology and flood risk map results can be valuable for identifying priority measures for flood risk reduction and management.

Figshare
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Flood risk modelling by the synergistic approach of machine learning and best-worst method in Indus Kohistan, Western Himalaya · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS