Science confirms Infinite space expansion is logical fallacy that contradict empirical data and logical frameworks and big bangs might be inevitable

Isaac mosinyan published a previous paper about “infinite big bangs” that challenges the one singular event of big bangs and infinite void. However, some could argue the paper alone was not enough to make others doubt old assumptions of eternal void, you must fight the core idea that gives birth in the idea of eternal void and eternal darkness that makes big bangs impossible and here is the paper to do exactly this job. The previous paper was a blend of politics and statistical results from big bangs in case of rebirths, politics and human ethics must change if they don’t want to reborn in extreme suffering and prevent new big bangs. However, lets dive deeper in this paper to make stronger the infinite big bang hypothesis by weakening the eternal void main source data and arguments. This article is made for those who actually want to <b>think critically</b> instead of just following what older scientists and outdated paradigms say without question. The goal here is not to make definitive claims but to show how <b>unlikely</b> it seems that the universe can avoid big bangs forever. Many people accept ideas like eternal expansion or an eternal void without ever questioning them, but if you actually analyze the logic behind those claims, you start to see serious contradictions. This is an article that pushes people to <b>look at the evidence without bias,</b> rather than just going along with whatever popular theories are repeated the most. The argument presented here is already <b>extremely difficult to refute,</b> and unless <b>new laws of physics</b> are discovered, <b>it might even be impossible to disprove.</b><b>The Infinite Expansion Assumption: A Speculative Idea With No Real Evidence</b>The only way the universe could avoid big bangs forever is if whatever is causing space expansion has infinite energy. That means space keeps expanding infinitely and never slows down, never loses energy, and never allows gravity to pull matter back into a singularity. Some scientists actually believe this is the case. The problem? That’s pure speculation. There is zero evidence that space expansion has an infinite energy source to keep it going forever. When you actually think about what infinity means, you run into a serious problem. If something is infinite, that means it has no beginning. And if the universe was always expanding infinitely, then the big bang would have never happened. Matter wouldn’t have come together in the first place, and we wouldn’t be here to have this conversation. This is the logical fallacy of the eternal void argument when space expansion is used as an excuse to justify it.Scientists who push the idea of eternal void without questioning these contradictions are falling into confirmation bias. They want to believe in eternal void because it fits their assumptions, not because the data actually supports it. Real science is about questioning everything, even ideas that have been around for a long time. If the logic doesn’t hold up, the theory needs to be challenged.