Authoritarian governance and rural urbanisation in China

The world has witnessed the concurrent rise of autocracies and urbanisation during the past decades. How do authoritarian regimes manage the transformation of rural societies, which are often lineage-based and self-governed under informal and customary rules? This study examines the question of contemporary village governance in socialist China. It reveals how the party-state has leveraged on the rural grassroots organisations and traditional village institutions to reward allegiance, cultivate loyalty, repress latent resistance and maintain political order in the urbanising villages. Focusing on the capital city of Beijing as a case study, this research reveals its differentiation strategy in managing the development of rural communities with different internal solidarity and political allegiance. This research clarifies how authoritarianism can accommodate self-governing rural communities, despite leading to a diversity of state-village relationships at the grassroots.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29458479
Primary Topic
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Authoritarian governance and rural urbanisation in China

Figshare
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
article

Authoritarian governance and rural urbanisation in China

article en

Abstract

The world has witnessed the concurrent rise of autocracies and urbanisation during the past decades. How do authoritarian regimes manage the transformation of rural societies, which are often lineage-based and self-governed under informal and customary rules? This study examines the question of contemporary village governance in socialist China. It reveals how the party-state has leveraged on the rural grassroots organisations and traditional village institutions to reward allegiance, cultivate loyalty, repress latent resistance and maintain political order in the urbanising villages. Focusing on the capital city of Beijing as a case study, this research reveals its differentiation strategy in managing the development of rural communities with different internal solidarity and political allegiance. This research clarifies how authoritarianism can accommodate self-governing rural communities, despite leading to a diversity of state-village relationships at the grassroots.

Figshare
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Authoritarian governance and rural urbanisation in China · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS