Additional file 1 of Safety and efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 93,057 minor stroke patients

Supplementary Material 1. Supplementary Fig. 1: Risk of bias assessment of the included randomized controlled trial using RoB 2.0 tool. Supplementary Fig. 2: Prediction of 90-day mRs 0–1 after using intravenous thrombolysis vs control. Supplementary Fig. 3: Prediction of NIHSS improvement after using intravenous thrombolysis vs control. Supplementary Fig. 4: Comparison between intravenous thrombolysis and control regarding the change in NIHSS. Supplementary Fig. 5: Leave-one-out for the prediction of 90-day mRs 0–1 in intravenous thrombolysis vs control using odds ratio. Supplementary Fig. 6: Leave-one-out analysis for the improvement of NIHSS in intravenous thrombolysis vs control. Supplementary Fig. 7: Leave-one-out for the prediction of NIHSS improvement in intravenous thrombolysis vs control using odds ratio. Supplementary Fig. 8: Leave-one-out for the effect of NIHSS after and before treatment with intravenous thrombolysis. Supplementary Fig. 9: Leave-one-out analysis for the comparison between intravenous thrombolysis and control groups regrading the change in NIHSS.