The stigma on right-wing parties: perceptions and voting behaviour

Right-wing parties are often stigmatised as extremists and racists. However, the extent to which voters perceive a party as stigmatised and the impact of such perceptions on voting behaviour remain unexplored. Drawing on European Election Studies, we mapped individual perceptions of the stigma associated with right-wing parties in 27 EU member states and identified contextual factors influencing these perceptions. We also evaluated the impact of perceived stigma on the propensity to vote for stigmatised parties. Multilevel analyses revealed that a communist legacy and prior government experience reduced the extent of stigmatisation of far-right parties. In contrast, a fascist legacy showed a weak correlation with the racist stigma associated with far-right parties. These contextual factors, however, had weak or null effects on the stigma perceptions of mainstream right parties. Individual attributes, including social class, gender, left/right ideology, residence, education, and age, also affected stigmatisation. Additionally, we tested the electoral consequences of stigma and found a negative correlation between stigma and voting for both mainstream right and far-right parties. This relationship, however, was conditional on the levels of political trust, immigration views, and economic evaluations. Our findings contribute to burgeoning research on party survival and debates on the mainstreaming of far-right ideas.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29039992
Primary Topic
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The stigma on right-wing parties: perceptions and voting behaviour

Figshare
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
article

The stigma on right-wing parties: perceptions and voting behaviour

article en

Abstract

Right-wing parties are often stigmatised as extremists and racists. However, the extent to which voters perceive a party as stigmatised and the impact of such perceptions on voting behaviour remain unexplored. Drawing on European Election Studies, we mapped individual perceptions of the stigma associated with right-wing parties in 27 EU member states and identified contextual factors influencing these perceptions. We also evaluated the impact of perceived stigma on the propensity to vote for stigmatised parties. Multilevel analyses revealed that a communist legacy and prior government experience reduced the extent of stigmatisation of far-right parties. In contrast, a fascist legacy showed a weak correlation with the racist stigma associated with far-right parties. These contextual factors, however, had weak or null effects on the stigma perceptions of mainstream right parties. Individual attributes, including social class, gender, left/right ideology, residence, education, and age, also affected stigmatisation. Additionally, we tested the electoral consequences of stigma and found a negative correlation between stigma and voting for both mainstream right and far-right parties. This relationship, however, was conditional on the levels of political trust, immigration views, and economic evaluations. Our findings contribute to burgeoning research on party survival and debates on the mainstreaming of far-right ideas.

Figshare
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.