Crash data availability and best practices across the United States

Though data on fatal crashes are available through the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) and are readily available to the public, many states do not make their crash data (including injuries) easily accessible for the public and the research community. The public has an interest in knowing when and where crashes occur, partly so they can demand that authorities improve safety. Researchers have an interest in being able to download data and conduct analyses to better understand mechanisms that lead to crashes and assist decision makers in designing effective policies. The objective of our study is to document the state of crash data availability throughout the country and to determine the best practices for crash data management and procedures for making data open and easily accessible. We reviewed 2 main dimensions of crash data, raw crash data and dashboards, by scouring the internet and reaching out to relevant stakeholders. We also conducted structured in-depth interviews of those responsible for crash data in selected states and various users of the data. We compiled a comprehensive nationwide database of open crash data characteristics for states and cities that provide such data. The database is available online in an effort to increase data transparency. Our interviews with stakeholders uncovered multiple issues beyond transparency, including quality control, usability, data linkages, data analysis, collaborations between stakeholders, and other political and financial constraints. Conclusions from our analysis include (1) the importance of linking crash data with other data sets (e.g., injury surveillance data); (2) the need for partnerships and collaborations between universities, advocates, and agencies; and (3) challenges with management of quality control. We present the results of our quantitative and qualitative work to offer best practices and Vision Zero guidance for state policymakers and traffic crash data experts.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28726696
Primary Topic
Traffic and Road Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crash data availability and best practices across the United States

Figshare
Traffic and Road Safety
article

Crash data availability and best practices across the United States

article en

Abstract

Though data on fatal crashes are available through the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) and are readily available to the public, many states do not make their crash data (including injuries) easily accessible for the public and the research community. The public has an interest in knowing when and where crashes occur, partly so they can demand that authorities improve safety. Researchers have an interest in being able to download data and conduct analyses to better understand mechanisms that lead to crashes and assist decision makers in designing effective policies. The objective of our study is to document the state of crash data availability throughout the country and to determine the best practices for crash data management and procedures for making data open and easily accessible. We reviewed 2 main dimensions of crash data, raw crash data and dashboards, by scouring the internet and reaching out to relevant stakeholders. We also conducted structured in-depth interviews of those responsible for crash data in selected states and various users of the data. We compiled a comprehensive nationwide database of open crash data characteristics for states and cities that provide such data. The database is available online in an effort to increase data transparency. Our interviews with stakeholders uncovered multiple issues beyond transparency, including quality control, usability, data linkages, data analysis, collaborations between stakeholders, and other political and financial constraints. Conclusions from our analysis include (1) the importance of linking crash data with other data sets (e.g., injury surveillance data); (2) the need for partnerships and collaborations between universities, advocates, and agencies; and (3) challenges with management of quality control. We present the results of our quantitative and qualitative work to offer best practices and Vision Zero guidance for state policymakers and traffic crash data experts.

Figshare
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Traffic and Road Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.