Quality, reliability, and content on social media about temporomandibular joint disorders: A systematic review

This systematic review aims to assess the quality, reliability, and content of TMD-related social media posts across multiple platforms. A comprehensive search of three databases were conducted. TMD related content on social media sites were considered eligible. The extracted data was narratively synthesized. Out of 254 studies, seven were included. YouTube was the most commonly assessed social media platform (n=5). Information created by amateurs encourages greater interaction than that of experts or news outlets. A majority videos and threads cover treatment choices. However, there is a noticeable absence of discussion on complications and prevention methods. Health professionals’ videos scored better in quality and reliability than -professionals’ videos. There is a need for creating evidence-based, accessible, and engaging content on TMD on social media and consideration of implementing rigorous information verification methods to ensure that high-quality, expert-validated content is prioritized in search results.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29040072.v1
Primary Topic
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality, reliability, and content on social media about temporomandibular joint disorders: A systematic review

Figshare
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
article

Quality, reliability, and content on social media about temporomandibular joint disorders: A systematic review

article en

Abstract

This systematic review aims to assess the quality, reliability, and content of TMD-related social media posts across multiple platforms. A comprehensive search of three databases were conducted. TMD related content on social media sites were considered eligible. The extracted data was narratively synthesized. Out of 254 studies, seven were included. YouTube was the most commonly assessed social media platform (n=5). Information created by amateurs encourages greater interaction than that of experts or news outlets. A majority videos and threads cover treatment choices. However, there is a noticeable absence of discussion on complications and prevention methods. Health professionals’ videos scored better in quality and reliability than -professionals’ videos. There is a need for creating evidence-based, accessible, and engaging content on TMD on social media and consideration of implementing rigorous information verification methods to ensure that high-quality, expert-validated content is prioritized in search results.

Figshare
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.