Psychological distress and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among parents of in-school children after the end of the zero-COVID-19 policy: A city-wide survey in South China

This study aims to examine the parents’ COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy after the end of the zero-COVID-19 policy in South China, and to identify the pathway of psychological distress affecting vaccine hesitancy based on the “3C” model (confidence, complacency, and convenience). A city-wide cross-sectional survey was conducted among parents of children in primary and junior middle schools from five districts of Shenzhen City, China. Information about demographic characteristics, health conditions for the children, parents’ psychological distress, and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was collected. Multi-variable logistic and linear regression models were applied to detect potential associations. Overall, 3127 parents were included (average age: 38.331 ± 5.757 years). Among their in-school children, the uptake rate of the COVID-19 vaccine for ≥1 dose, ≥2 doses, and ≥3 doses were 98.2%, 94.9%, and 11.0%, respectively by April 2023. The overall rate of parents’ vaccine hesitancy was 43.6%. Parents with anxiety (OR: 1.685, 95%CI: 1.250 ~ 2.272), depression (OR: 1.507, 95%CI: 1.105 ~ 2.054), and a high-stress level (OR: 1.162, 95%CI: 1.000 ~ 1.350) were more likely to report vaccine hesitancy. For parents’ COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, stress affected all “3C” dimensions (confidence: β = 0.099, complacency: β = 0.138, and convenience: β = 0.117, all <i>P</i> &lt; .001), while depression affected two dimensions (complacency: β = 0.068, <i>P</i> &lt; .001, convenience: β = 0.042, <i>P</i> = .021) and anxiety only affected one dimension (complacency: β = 0.074, <i>P</i> &lt; .001). This study identifies a significant proportion of Chinese parents reporting COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy for their in-school children after the end of zero-COVID-19 policy. Immediate mental healthcare services and tailored health education based on the “3C” model should be provided to parents with psychological distress.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29674287.v1
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychological distress and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among parents of in-school children after the end of the zero-COVID-19 policy: A city-wide survey in South China

Figshare
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

Psychological distress and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among parents of in-school children after the end of the zero-COVID-19 policy: A city-wide survey in South China

article en

Abstract

This study aims to examine the parents’ COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy after the end of the zero-COVID-19 policy in South China, and to identify the pathway of psychological distress affecting vaccine hesitancy based on the “3C” model (confidence, complacency, and convenience). A city-wide cross-sectional survey was conducted among parents of children in primary and junior middle schools from five districts of Shenzhen City, China. Information about demographic characteristics, health conditions for the children, parents’ psychological distress, and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was collected. Multi-variable logistic and linear regression models were applied to detect potential associations. Overall, 3127 parents were included (average age: 38.331 ± 5.757 years). Among their in-school children, the uptake rate of the COVID-19 vaccine for ≥1 dose, ≥2 doses, and ≥3 doses were 98.2%, 94.9%, and 11.0%, respectively by April 2023. The overall rate of parents’ vaccine hesitancy was 43.6%. Parents with anxiety (OR: 1.685, 95%CI: 1.250 ~ 2.272), depression (OR: 1.507, 95%CI: 1.105 ~ 2.054), and a high-stress level (OR: 1.162, 95%CI: 1.000 ~ 1.350) were more likely to report vaccine hesitancy. For parents’ COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, stress affected all “3C” dimensions (confidence: β = 0.099, complacency: β = 0.138, and convenience: β = 0.117, all <i>P</i> &lt; .001), while depression affected two dimensions (complacency: β = 0.068, <i>P</i> &lt; .001, convenience: β = 0.042, <i>P</i> = .021) and anxiety only affected one dimension (complacency: β = 0.074, <i>P</i> &lt; .001). This study identifies a significant proportion of Chinese parents reporting COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy for their in-school children after the end of zero-COVID-19 policy. Immediate mental healthcare services and tailored health education based on the “3C” model should be provided to parents with psychological distress.

Figshare
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.