Moderating effect of stimulus presentation type, contingency awareness and anxiety on evaluative conditioning: an attentional perspective

The present study explored how evaluative conditioning (EC) is impacted by the type of stimulus presentation (sequential versus simultaneous), considering also other possible attention- and memory-related moderators at both procedural (contingency awareness, ambivalence) and individual levels (anxiety). A sample of 537 adult participants completed either a simultaneous or sequential conditioning procedure using positive, negative, neutral, and ambivalent unconditioned stimuli (US) paired with neutral conditioned stimuli (CS). Participants evaluated the CS both before and after conditioning and completed a memory task assessing their contingency awareness (memory of the US valence paired with each CS). Results indicated that the EC effect was significantly larger in simultaneous conditioning and in the presence of contingency awareness. Participant’s anxiety level did not moderate the effect in either monovalent EC (positive versus negative) or ambivalent EC (ambivalent versus neutral). Findings are discussed in terms of theoretical and practical implications.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29550165
Primary Topic
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Moderating effect of stimulus presentation type, contingency awareness and anxiety on evaluative conditioning: an attentional perspective

Figshare
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
article

Moderating effect of stimulus presentation type, contingency awareness and anxiety on evaluative conditioning: an attentional perspective

article en

Abstract

The present study explored how evaluative conditioning (EC) is impacted by the type of stimulus presentation (sequential versus simultaneous), considering also other possible attention- and memory-related moderators at both procedural (contingency awareness, ambivalence) and individual levels (anxiety). A sample of 537 adult participants completed either a simultaneous or sequential conditioning procedure using positive, negative, neutral, and ambivalent unconditioned stimuli (US) paired with neutral conditioned stimuli (CS). Participants evaluated the CS both before and after conditioning and completed a memory task assessing their contingency awareness (memory of the US valence paired with each CS). Results indicated that the EC effect was significantly larger in simultaneous conditioning and in the presence of contingency awareness. Participant’s anxiety level did not moderate the effect in either monovalent EC (positive versus negative) or ambivalent EC (ambivalent versus neutral). Findings are discussed in terms of theoretical and practical implications.

Figshare
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.