<b>Quantitative Evaluation of Pupil Size Influence on Distance, Intermediate, and Near Visual Acuity in Eyes Implanted with Three Presbyopia-Correcting IOLs</b>

<b>Abstract</b><b>Purpose </b>– To quantify the influence of mesopic pupil size on distance, intermediate, and near visual acuity (VA) after implantation of three presbyopia‑correcting intraocular lenses (IOLs).<b>Setting</b> – Eleven ophthalmology clinics and outpatient surgical centers, Germany.<b>Design</b> – Retrospective multicenter cohort study; non‑randomized and unmasked.<b>Methods</b> – Electronic health‑record data from 19 315 eyes (October 2016 to September 2024) were screened. Eyes implanted with Eyhance, FineVision, or RayOne Trifocal IOLs and with documented mesopic pupil size were eligible. Decimal VAs were converted to logMAR and invalid values removed. Linear regression related pupil size to uncorrected and corrected distance VA (UDVA/CDVA) in 3 563 eyes; after restricting to UDVA ≤ 0.10 logMAR, uncorrected intermediate (UIVA) and near (UNVA) VAs were analyzed in 3 073 eyes. Extreme pupil‑size quartiles were compared with the Mann‑Whitney test; false‑discovery rate was controlled. A‑priori and post‑hoc statistical powers were calculated for both tests.<b>Results</b> – Thirty IOL–VA combinations were evaluated; a‑priori power ≥ 0.80 was achieved in 29. FineVision monocular UIVA showed a quartile difference (p = 0.014; Cliff’s Δ = –0.10) and RayOne Trifocal binocular UNVA exhibited a slope of –0.017 logMAR per mm (p = 0.003). Post‑hoc power for these findings was low (0.47 and 0.05, respectively). Eyhance displayed non‑significant trends toward worse UIVA and UNVA with larger pupils (p ≈ 0.20). No distance‑vision dependence on pupil size was detected. All lenses yielded safety indices &gt; 1 and efficacy indices &gt; 0.97.<b>Conclusion </b>– All three IOLs demonstrated generally stable postoperative visual acuity across mesopic pupil diameters. Statistically significant but underpowered associations were found for binocular UNVA with the RayOne Trifocal and monocular UIVA with FineVision, and additional non-significant trends justify confirmation in larger, prospective cohorts.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29047106.v1
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantitative Evaluation of Pupil Size Influence on Distance, Intermediate, and Near Visual Acuity in Eyes Implanted with Three Presbyopia-Correcting IOLs

Figshare
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

Quantitative Evaluation of Pupil Size Influence on Distance, Intermediate, and Near Visual Acuity in Eyes Implanted with Three Presbyopia-Correcting IOLs

article en

Abstract

<b>Abstract</b><b>Purpose </b>– To quantify the influence of mesopic pupil size on distance, intermediate, and near visual acuity (VA) after implantation of three presbyopia‑correcting intraocular lenses (IOLs).<b>Setting</b> – Eleven ophthalmology clinics and outpatient surgical centers, Germany.<b>Design</b> – Retrospective multicenter cohort study; non‑randomized and unmasked.<b>Methods</b> – Electronic health‑record data from 19 315 eyes (October 2016 to September 2024) were screened. Eyes implanted with Eyhance, FineVision, or RayOne Trifocal IOLs and with documented mesopic pupil size were eligible. Decimal VAs were converted to logMAR and invalid values removed. Linear regression related pupil size to uncorrected and corrected distance VA (UDVA/CDVA) in 3 563 eyes; after restricting to UDVA ≤ 0.10 logMAR, uncorrected intermediate (UIVA) and near (UNVA) VAs were analyzed in 3 073 eyes. Extreme pupil‑size quartiles were compared with the Mann‑Whitney test; false‑discovery rate was controlled. A‑priori and post‑hoc statistical powers were calculated for both tests.<b>Results</b> – Thirty IOL–VA combinations were evaluated; a‑priori power ≥ 0.80 was achieved in 29. FineVision monocular UIVA showed a quartile difference (p = 0.014; Cliff’s Δ = –0.10) and RayOne Trifocal binocular UNVA exhibited a slope of –0.017 logMAR per mm (p = 0.003). Post‑hoc power for these findings was low (0.47 and 0.05, respectively). Eyhance displayed non‑significant trends toward worse UIVA and UNVA with larger pupils (p ≈ 0.20). No distance‑vision dependence on pupil size was detected. All lenses yielded safety indices &gt; 1 and efficacy indices &gt; 0.97.<b>Conclusion </b>– All three IOLs demonstrated generally stable postoperative visual acuity across mesopic pupil diameters. Statistically significant but underpowered associations were found for binocular UNVA with the RayOne Trifocal and monocular UIVA with FineVision, and additional non-significant trends justify confirmation in larger, prospective cohorts.

Figshare
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

<b>Quantitative Evaluation of Pupil Size Influence on Distance, Intermediate, and Near Visual Acuity in Eyes Implanted with Three Presbyopia-Correcting IOLs</b> · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS